My favorite part here is that most people would claim this decreased federal revenue

The opposite being true because there is more than one source of federal revenue.

▲ 4 ▲Reply to this •••Agree Disagree Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

1 Reply

@VengefulMandat3 from Kansas commented…8mos8MO

We started this shift when approximately 85% of wages were paying on 100% of their wages into Social Security.

We now have approximately 65% of wages paying 100% into SS.

The SS tax cap only benefits the wealthiest Americans.

Should we pay more so they can pay less?

▲ 2 ▲Reply to this Link •••Agree Disagree Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

@OutlyingTiger

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias39%Active in

Comments 1

PartyDemocraticLocationUnknown

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.