Try the political quiz

10 Replies

 @9LFK3KQ from West Virginia answered…2mos2MO

I think it would bring peace to the world. With no weapons to fight everyone is forced to talk it our like a rational person.

 @9LJY87DLibertarian from Ohio disagreed…2mos2MO

it would weaken those countries that actually would want peace, leaving them with no weapons. There is always going to be wicked people so we just can't trust that every country is going to want peace and abide by those rules. We will need weapons to defend ourselves or go to war if necessary.

 @9LFLRP9 from Pennsylvania agreed…2mos2MO

The only weapons had if firearms and general weapons are out of the question are your own body and those you make yourself. We would have to either talk like rational people, or fight it out gladiator style, 1-on-1 fights. Either way a more enjoyable world with less wars, and just entertainment style fighting duals when we must resort to violence.

 @9LGB9FKIndependent from Indiana answered…2mos2MO

Although it may bring peace among many, if one went against the treaty and attacked those without weaponry to defend themselves, it may cause greater conflict. Future generations may be in a world of peace that could be suddenly disrupted by those whom don't follow the treaty.

 @9LGN88GWomen’s Equality from Arizona agreed…2mos2MO

absolutely, if a treaty is followed in which arms are prohibited it would be unrealistic to believe it to be successful as it would be very easily and catastrophically violated.

 @9LFMFQM from West Virginia answered…2mos2MO

It will impact future generations in every way possible, the way they live, the way they think, the control that they are under.

 @9LFL46X from Oklahoma answered…2mos2MO

Criminals, and other people who seek to harm will still continue to have them illiegally, so it will only hurt the unarmed

 @9LFKCTDProgressive from Kansas answered…2mos2MO

it would teach the future generations about the travesties and hardships that taught us more of what happened around the world

 @9LFKFNZ from Utah answered…2mos2MO

I feel that it could go either ways. Yes it could stop the wars in the future cause of no fighting but you can never fully trust others to a treaty. In the past people have broke treaty's and can easily do it again.

 @9LFJC8VPeace and Freedomanswered…2mos2MO

It would show them that not all ways do the answer have to be war or some type of fight but instead peace

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...