Try the political quiz

220 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would you adapt if a service you rely on, like streaming or gaming, required a subscription fee hike to balance its budget?

 @9LJ4MFW from Nevada answered…1mo1MO

I would not be a happy at all if I was charged for trying to play a video that I payed to play, on top of that paying a subscriptions to play online and buying the console itself is enough money spent so I wouldn't like if a fee was added to video games.

 @9LJ3KDNRepublican from Utah answered…1mo1MO

 @9LJ3DS2 from Colorado answered…1mo1MO

i would be kinda upset but at the same time kids need time away from screens

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Can you think of a time when money spent on community infrastructure (like roads, parks) directly benefited you or your neighborhood?

 @9L3BWG8 from Kentucky answered…2mos2MO

Building a park close to my neighborhood seemed to improve the happiness of the children around, and it reduced the amount of kids that play dangerously.

 @9L5CL7F from Kansas agreed…2mos2MO

If the home is close to the park, then people shouldn't have to worry about their kids getting taken or go missing when their house is right there. Having a park close to the neighborhood is safer and if it makes kids happy then let them be happy.

 @9L4RBPD from Virginia agreed…2mos2MO

In my hometown building more parks brought more tourists and people to my community and boosted our restaurants, hotels, businesses and other aspects of the economy.

 @9L3BWYZ from Nevada answered…2mos2MO

I was able to spend less money on gas to go the big parks in stead i went to ones in my neighborhood

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

Imagine you're running a fundraiser; how would you make sure you spend less than you earn?

 @9KFJS4CRepublican  from New York answered…3mos3MO

 @9KFL35Sanswered…3mos3MO

Make a program that allows for funding support and use resources that cost less, as well as having programs that raise money

 @9KFKNVY from West Virginia answered…3mos3MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How does the thought of potential tax increases to cover government debt make you feel?

 @9HV3SW8from Virgin Islands answered…4mos4MO

The government has been reckless and irresponsible in its spending and that's how we ended up with the debt. The taxes that are in place could reduce the debt incrementally and easily if reckless government spending was removed.

 @9HTQJF7 from Kentucky answered…4mos4MO

I think that it makes sense why they are taking the money but also there a families that are barely cutting corners to live there lives so the government should give a little flexibility if they do raise taxes.

 @9HWD75N from Georgia disagreed…4mos4MO

The government spends trillions of dollars on things that many Americans do not agree with and are not informed about. We should not be responsible for the government's irresponsible spending. There should be drastic budget cuts to help get rid of government debt.

 @9HWCVVY from South Carolina disagreed…4mos4MO

Raising the taxes causes a raise in overall cost of living, so the families in need are also causing the middle class to become poor.

 @9HTQMRS from Wyoming answered…4mos4MO

No! The government should make its own money independent from the public. Taxes are necessary, but there comes a point where taxes become excessive and the government should make their own money partly dependant on the general public.

 @9HTQHML from Minnesota answered…4mos4MO

Makes me fell fine as long as every U.S citizen is getting taxed no matter what the cause.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What do you feel are the risks of a government carrying high debt?

 @9HCV85PProgressive from Florida answered…6mos6MO

High government debt poses several risks, for example, interest payments, economic instability, limited fiscal space, inflationary pressures, etc.

 @9HCTWJG from Colorado answered…6mos6MO

 @9HCTY7J from California answered…6mos6MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Why might someone argue that low taxes are beneficial for a country's citizens?

 @9HKNGVVDemocrat from Massachusetts answered…5mos5MO

If taxes are lowered then citizens will have more money to send on necessities like food, clothes, houses, ect.

 @9HKNBCV from California answered…5mos5MO

Low taxes are beneficial for a country's citizens so that they don't have to have any extra worries that come from money that they already have like housing, taking care of children, and insurance.

 @9HKNRGBDemocrat from California answered…5mos5MO

It is beneficial to lower taxes to citizens because if we lower taxes then the government gets less of our taxes which then causes them to lower there prices over everything and instead of inflation we go backwards.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

What would happen if your parents took a loan out in your name for their expenses, and how does this relate to national debt?

 @9KS4KGM from Texas answered…2mos2MO

 @9KS48N5Women’s Equality from Texas answered…2mos2MO

that would would mess up my credit so when im an adult i have to build my credit

 @9KRQR2H from New York commented…2mos2MO

if they don't pay it back my credit score would be the one to get messed up leaving me in debt and with the intrest getting higher

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What do you think are the pros and cons of reducing government intervention in the economy?

 @9HKPJTW from Virginia answered…5mos5MO

A freer market is more efficient and less prone to selective enforcement, but tends to allow wealth to concentrate very narrowly and to be moved out of the country. The goal of government policy should be a country of small capitalists — a mix of private citizens with enough capital to support themselves, and small businesses — which is an outcome that normally needs a thumb on the scale.

 @9HKPBH7from Virgin Islands answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Is it fair for future generations to inherit the debt created by our government's spending?

 @9HKNH5RRepublican from Texas answered…5mos5MO

It's not fair because if we keep this ideology the world will leave messes for others to pick up instead of dealing with it firsthand.

 @9HKN226 from Michigan answered…5mos5MO

No, it is not. They should be able to live debt free, without the debts of war.

 @9HKMXQD from Pennsylvania answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

Have you or your family ever benefited from a government program that others might deem nonessential?

 @9J5PQLJ from Florida answered…4mos4MO

Yes, when my mom was pregnant with me she signed up for something and it provided her with food for her and me until i was 3.

 @9J5PNKT from Florida answered…4mos4MO

Yes, however, we where not really in support of it since we felt that it would heavily rase cost of living in the long run which it did, this was during covid

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What are your thoughts on the government's role in providing for public services versus individual responsibility?

 @9HKN7PQ from California answered…5mos5MO

It will help the people who struggle, especially in the economy we have today.

 @9HKN64N from Pennsylvania answered…5mos5MO

I think the government has a duty to provide for us, but we also have a duty to do our part and coexist.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What are the potential consequences of a government failing to restrain its spending?

 @claireemilycook  from Iowa commented…5mos5MO

The issue is not government spending. The issue is not taxing the rich and corporations.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

If you had to cut your personal expenses, which would be the hardest to give up, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

Can a government ever truly create a balanced budget without impacting social services?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...