Voluntaryism

You believe that a society based on voluntary interactions and free from coercion will lead to a more prosperous, peaceful, and just world.

Voluntaryism, also known as voluntarism, is a political philosophy that upholds the principle of voluntary association in society. It advocates for a society where all relations and transactions are based on voluntary, mutual consent rather than coercion or force. Voluntaryists argue that all forms of government intervention and regulation infringe upon individual freedom and should therefore be avoided. They believe that social order can be achieved and maintained through voluntary agreements and contracts among individuals.

The roots of voluntaryism can be traced back to the ideas…   of classical liberal thinkers such as John Locke and Adam Smith, who emphasized individual liberty and free markets. However, the term "voluntaryism" itself was first used in this context in the 19th century by British free-market economists like Auberon Herbert and Herbert Spencer. They argued against state intervention in economic affairs and promoted voluntary exchanges as the basis of a free society.

In the 20th century, the philosophy of voluntaryism was further developed by libertarian thinkers such as Murray Rothbard and Robert Nozick. They expanded on the ideas of their predecessors, arguing not only for economic freedom but also for the abolition of the state itself. They proposed that all services traditionally provided by the state, including law enforcement and defense, could be better provided by the free market.

Voluntaryism has been influential in the development of anarcho-capitalism, a political philosophy that combines the principles of anarchism with capitalism. Anarcho-capitalists, like voluntaryists, advocate for the elimination of the state and the establishment of a society based on voluntary exchanges.

Despite its influence, voluntaryism remains a fringe philosophy, with few adherents compared to mainstream political ideologies. Critics argue that a society based solely on voluntary exchanges would be unable to provide for the needs of the most vulnerable and could lead to significant social inequality. However, voluntaryists counter that voluntary charity and mutual aid could address these issues more effectively than state intervention.