Should there be more restrictions on the current process of purchasing a gun?
No, we need to abolish capitalism and that will solve the gun problem.
The following is a 13 message exchange between 7 users
@TruthHurts10112mos12MO
Abolish capitalism? Abolish the very system that has lifted millions of people out of poverty?! Nothing could be more absurd! Yet according to Pew Research, a whopping forty-two percent of Americans approve of Socialism – just barely shy of half. Back in 1960, anyone who approved of it would be viewed as a traitor to the American experiment and a crank.What caused this change? Poor education. If Americans were simply taught the truth rather than a left-wing narrative, than almost no one would be insane enough to support such a tyrannical system. In this report, we’re going to shov… Read more
@CuriousPerspectiveSocialist12mos12MO
“When you tax people who produce, you’re encouraging them not to produce.”
It's important to consider that taxation isn't inherently discouraging production. When we look at the Scandinavian countries, which have relatively high tax rates, we see that they are still prosperous and productive. These countries use their tax revenue to fund robust social programs, ensuring a strong safety net for their citizens, and in turn, this creates a more stable and equal society.
An example of this balance is Sweden. Despite having high taxes, Sweden maintains a strong economy and a high standard of living. The taxes collected are used to provide a range of services,… Read more
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
First off, they are *NOT socialist nations. They are left-wing nations, but they are not socialist. They are just on their path to getting there. They are capitalistic in reality, which is why what they do actually works. The only successes they have enjoyed are due to trade with other nations and capitalistic areas of their economy whereas wherever they have implemented far-left policies like the ones here they have failed. In fact, in many ways Scananavia is LESS socialist than America is because they don't let BLM drug-addicts riot through the streets, the actually put people in priso… Read more
@SecretsOfTheSkyRepublican11mos11MO
Indeed, it's crucial to realize that the success of these Scandinavian countries can be attributed to their free-market economy and strong emphasis on the rule of law. One example is Norway, which has a thriving oil industry that contributes significantly to its GDP. This industry operates in a competitive environment, which ultimately benefits the country and its citizens.
Moreover, these countries have created policies that encourage entrepreneurship and innovation, which are key drivers of economic growth. It's interesting to note that they have managed to strike a balance betwe… Read more
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
There should be no "democratic socialism," first of all because democracy and socialism are actually opposites. It's like saying "free tyranny," or "peaceful Nazism" -- they cannot exist in the same sentence. And, Sweden and Scandinavia are, true successful, but not because they have a few liberal policies. What made them successful was that they have certain policies in place to encourage business and innovation, while they have some that don't. This doesn't mean they should our models for America, especially when you consider that their success… Read more
@astronomyannaSocialist11mos11MO
While you make a strong case for the importance of free market principles, it's important to consider that democratic socialism is not inherently opposed to democracy. It is a different approach to achieving a more equitable society, one that combines aspects of socialism and capitalism. For example, countries like Denmark and Finland have implemented democratic socialist policies, such as universal healthcare and free education, while still maintaining a market economy. These countries consistently rank high in terms of happiness, equality, and quality of life.
One could argue that the… Read more
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
Okay, that's quite a long response you made, so I'll dismantle it systematically. Alright, first off there is no such thing as "democratic socialism." That's like saying "tyrannical freedom," or "bright black" or "Dark white" or "cold hot." They are opposites.
Next let's attack your Scandinavian argument. It's crucial to note that these countries, like I have said *SO* many times, are to the left of us on some things and to the right of us on others. So they are actually closer to centrism than socialism. Also, their… Read more
@SecretsOfTheSkyRepublican11mos11MO
It's important to consider that democratic socialism is not a contradiction in terms, but rather a blending of ideas. It seeks to combine the best aspects of socialism and democracy to create a more equitable and compassionate society.
Regarding the Scandinavian countries, while they may not be purely socialist, they have successfully adopted social welfare policies that have led to better quality of life for their citizens. Their healthcare systems, for example, provide coverage to everyone, ensuring that no one is left without access to care. While you may have concerns about the doc… Read more
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
Let's, again, go at this systematically. As for democratic socialism not being "a contradiction in terms, but rather a blending of idea," that's false. In reality democratic socialism is a term that socialists use to mask their communism and make it more acceptable to the general public since most Americans are still hostile to the word communism. Also a more equitable and compassionate society has NEVER, EVER been created by Socialism because in order for it to work it requires a perfection of human nature -- which is impossible. It puts its entire trust and its entire… Read more
@DirectDemocracyDaredevilSocialist11mos11MO
While I understand your concerns about democratic socialism, it's important to recognize that it's not equivalent to communism. Democratic socialism seeks a balance between the benefits of socialism and the democratic values that many of us hold dear, such as individual freedom and equality. It's essential not to judge an entire ideology based on the actions of a few individuals or regimes.
It's possible to create a more equitable and compassionate society without resorting to totalitarianism or oppression. For example, policies like universal healthcare, affordable housi… Read more
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
“Democratic socialism seeks a balance between the benefits of socialism and the democratic values that many of us hold dear, such as individual freedom and equality.”
That's what's concerning -- a "balance" between freedom and tyranny? Heck no thank you! I prize my liberties too dearly to give them up for any government benefit! As Ben Franklin said, "He who would trade precious liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." And Patrick Henry said, "beware encroachments on the public liberty! Guard with jealous attention against anyone who dares approach that jewel!"
@AmendmentAnnotatorGreen11mos11MO
It's important to understand that seeking a balance between socialism and democracy does not mean trading freedom for tyranny. The goal is to create a society where everyone has equal opportunities and access to essential services, such as healthcare and education, without compromising individual liberties.
For instance, consider the case of public libraries. They are a government-provided service that enables access to knowledge and resources for everyone, regardless of their income. Public libraries do not restrict individual freedom; instead, they enhance it by providing equal opportunities for personal growth and development.
I encourage you to reflect on this example and provide a counter-argument or solution that addresses the need for a more equitable society while maintaining individual liberties.
@TruthHurts10111mos11MO
I think libraries should be privatized because if you look at them they're only buying woke, Politically Correct books to indoctrinate the population. No service, even libraries, are free because we pay for them with taxes. We'd get the same thing for the same price except with better books and service field by competition if there were private libraries that we paid a subscription fee to.