"As for the fossil evidence, there is none to speak of. No transitional fossils exist other than those that have been pieced together by imaginative and biased scientists hoping to prove their theory."
This is blatantly anti-scientific, conspiracy theory claims. All of science has long had consensus on this, and is an incredibly well-documented field of paleontology and biology. The original link I had sent you even explains this: "If two or more species share a unique physical feature, such as a complex bone structure or a body plan, they may all have inherited this feature from a common ancestor. Physical features shared due to evolutionary history (a common ancestor) are said to be homologous. To give one classic example, the forelimbs of whales, humans, birds, and dogs look pretty different on the outside. That's because they're adapted to function in different environments. However, if you look at the bone structure of the forelimbs, you'll find that the pattern of bones is very similar across species. It's unlikely that such similar structures would have evolved independently in each species, and more likely that the basic layout of bones was already present in a common ancestor of whales, humans, dogs, and birds. Some homologous structures can be seen only in embryos. For instance, all vertebrate embryos (including humans) have gill slits and a tail during early development. The developmental patterns of these species become more different later on (which is why your embryonic tail is now your tailbone, and your gill slits have turned into your jaw and inner ear)2• Homologous embryonic structures reflect that the developmental programs of vertebrates are variations on a similar plan that existed in their last common ancestor.
"For example "Lucy", long cited as "proof" of molecules-to-man evolution, consisted of bones from separate species found hundreds of feet apart, and plastered together."
Firstly, again, "Lucy" is… Read more
Be the first to reply to this comment.