Therefore, the power dynamics are significantly imbalanced. While it's true that the First Intifada involved mostly nonviolent resistance, it's also important to note that subsequent uprisings have seen increased use of suicide bombings and rocket attacks by Palestinian militants. These actions, while framed as self-defense by some, have often resulted in civilian casualties, which complicates the narrative.
Contrast this with the conflict in Ukraine. Both Russia and Ukraine have established militaries and are recognized states. Their conflict, while tragic, is conducted between two conventional armies, which changes the dynamics of self-defense.
An important aspect to consider is the adherence to international laws of war, including the protection of civilians and the proportionality of response. While the right to self-defense should be universal, it must be balanced against the rights of civilians not to be disproportionately harmed by that defense.
Be the first to reply to this disagreement.