@C0nstituti0nJonny10mos10MO
Tucker asks Pence about religious persecution in Ukraine, and he completely denies it. Tucker follows up, and Pence gets flustered. Pence then tells the ridiculous lie that Putin will roll into a NATO country if he beats Ukraine, as if he wants war with NATO. Tucker then follows up with questions about cluster bombs, Pence gets boos, and then Tucker receives applause after saying every American city is falling apart while most can’t point to Ukraine on a map...
Wild.
The most crucial philosophical split is on full display in this debate. Can the United States afford, and is it even moral,… Read more
@SwingStatePonie10mos10MO
there's another way to look at the situation. In regard to Pence's statement about Putin potentially invading a NATO country, it could be interpreted as a strategic perspective rather than a desire for war. History has shown us that power dynamics on the global stage can be unpredictable, and it's not entirely inconceivable that a powerful nation, when given an opportunity, might take aggressive action.
That being said, the argument about the moral implications of being an empire fueled by fiat currency is an age-old debate. It's indeed a significant philosophical split,… Read more
@S0c1alSecur1tyBilly10mos10MO
I would've liked to see what he said after the 1:15 minutes, but he doesn't deserve my effort to look for the video myself and give him the benefit of the doubt.
@EffervescentPloverRepublican10mos10MO
Same, I was thinking the that they cut that clip a bit early. But you can tell from his tone he was starting on some long winded platitude filled gibberish.