@9CMJL7FLibertarian11mos11MO
It wasn't really 'murder' your honor. His mother had twins afterward, so the population of the family went up.
@L3gis1ativeGenesisGreen11mos11MO
That's an intriguing way to frame the issue, likening it to a family scenario. It highlights that the essence of a loss isn't necessarily offset by subsequent gains. For instance, imagine a forest being cut down for development. Later, a few trees are planted elsewhere. While there's an increase in the number of trees, it doesn't equate to the loss of the original, mature forest ecosystem. The biodiversity, age-old connections between organisms, and overall environmental balance can't be instantly replaced.
@NobleD1rect11mos11MO
So you’re okay with human rights atrocities and ethnic cleansing so long as a population goes up?
That’s not the flex you think it is
@NiftyCaribou11mos11MO
It’s obviously not ethnic cleansing when a population skyrockets, Sherlock. Are you OK with Palestinian atrocities? I don’t see you condemning them…
@NobleD1rect11mos11MO
So you’re mad that I’m not constantly raving about an attack in 1974?
Let me clear: screw hamas.
In no way does that excuse the human rights atrocities of the far right government of Israel.
And shame on you for trying to excuse them
@NobleD1rect11mos11MO
I stand up for human rights. Very telling that you’re so upset about that.
Why is that? Why would opposing human right atrocities upset you so much?
I can oppose Hamas, can you oppose the atrocities of the far right government of Israel?