Try the political quiz

3 Replies

  @TonyForCA  from New Jersey commented…9mos9MO

OSHA operations are not streamlined enough to be considered efficient or sufficient.

OSHA simply doesn't have the resources to take care of all the issues.

Basically, our Division of Labor would offer financial incentives in exchange for these employees to report their findings and day-to-day experience to the state in a fair amount of detail. If people do not accept the offer, we can send people who work for the Division of Labor undercover in a similar fashion, and the workers who accept those assignments would receive a raise for their work.

I would push for a mandate that requires the Division of Labor to keep the identities of those who apply for the offer 100% confidential, even removing all evidence of their name in public documents related to any action taken by the Division of Labor as a result of their findings.

 @ExuberantR1ghtWingfrom Florida asked for more information…9mos9MO

I would push for a mandate that requires the Division of Labor to keep the identities of those who apply for the offer 100% confidential, even removing all evidence of their name in public documents related to any action taken by the Division of Labor as a result of their findings.

Do you mean the whistleblowers?

  @TonyForCA  from New Jersey commented…9mos9MO

Yes, I would push for a state law to be passed that guarantees the identity protection of any and all whistleblowers who are complying with the Division of Labor.

In order to keep trust within the program, we must ensure the confidentiality of the whistleblowers who decide to assist the Division of Labor.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this agreement.

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement biasNo data yetAudience bias0%Active inPartyLibertarianLocationPelham, AL