Try the political quiz

311 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How could living in a larger family impact your individual pursuit of happiness and personal growth?

 @9KCPVRYPeace and Freedom from Virginia answered…3mos3MO

You may not get as much attention that you need, that can lead you to development issues.

 @9KH5FP7 from Illinois disagreed…3mos3MO

Many times in larger families you don't get as much 1 on 1 attention, but that fosters independence and creativity. When you take risks and fail, you grow as a person. That growth can then lead happiness.

 @9KGRRG4 from Oklahoma agreed…3mos3MO

The parents could be focusing on one kid while the rest don't get as much attention causing them to do bad things.

 @9KCPSK4 from Missouri answered…3mos3MO

I dont really think the size of your family has an impact direclty on your happiness, there is so many different factors that relate to this topic. Just because you come from a bigger family doesnt directly mean that you would have a struggling house-hold.

 @9KHR2R8 from Georgia disagreed…3mos3MO

Large families can have many affects on your life. Your siblings can be a great safety net to catch and help you if you fall on hard times. Or they can make your life much harder than necessary and sibling can fight for the attention of their parents.

 @9KCQ67G from Texas answered…3mos3MO

it would imacpt on lifestyle changes since larger families tends to be more close knit inherently and the american dream is often promoting indavisualism and personal growth it would likely lead to an more community based social world with good creativity but simply not enough means to achieve the ideas sprouted from that creativity since the birthrates would skyrocket andprices and resources (prices as of now) just arent going to support that

 @9KCPJ6V from Texas answered…3mos3MO

I think it'll make me happier with myself, and give me more perspectives and people to guide me who have proof that they've succeeded in those same steps.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

When thinking about your future, how does the prospect of sharing resources with an increasing population affect you?

 @9KM6FW2 from Utah answered…2mos2MO

negatively. I believe that church and government need to be separated. I see our population as a problem that is getting out of control and need to start mandating sexual education in the school system.

 @9KNBZY4 from Alabama disagreed…2mos2MO

We have already had sexual education in schools and the population was still steadily increasing. The only help for this is to stop subsidizing single motherhood and provide more affordable contraceptives.

 @9KM5VW5 from New Jersey answered…2mos2MO

 @9KM5Y7N from New Jersey answered…2mos2MO

I think that people shouldn't be able to limit one's resources, and I believe people shouldn't be hoarders.

 @9KM5LCNPeace and Freedom from Washington answered…2mos2MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…4mos4MO

How would you feel if someone you love chose to have many children, possibly impacting their time with you?

 @9JT5BB3 from Arizona answered…3mos3MO

I wouldn't care or be mad at them for wanting to have a big family.

 @9JY6MFK from Virginia agreed…3mos3MO

i just feel like you cant really be mad about how someone feels about themselves and their families.

 @9JTWZNT  from Nebraska agreed…3mos3MO

If somebody chooses to have a large family, that is a beautiful and wonderful thing, to dedicate one's life to raising a family. While it may impact the parents' social life and those of their friends and relatives, you cannot fault someone for wanting to have a family, and a large one at that.

 @9JT65S3 from California answered…3mos3MO

I'm most likely to oppose the ideal of natalism. However, I do agree that families are vital for child development when a child is at process of learning realities and facts, soon or later, once they finally grow up and mature enough, including open-minded children. But also, it varies on family situations that women are most likely a predominant victims of abuse, rape, and forced labor. It also includes that wives are not willing to receive children due to husbands' actions, financial situations, or being subjected to forced marriage. Marriage is most likely a privilege for American couples, it's the government's duties to enchance background checks on couples about discovering their criminal records such illicit activities or committing frauds in systems.

 @9JTDDS8 from California disagreed…3mos3MO

Having children only increases the time that I would get to spend with you, because of the time that we would spend together to raise these kids, it would only bring us closer.

 @9JT4VN3 from California answered…3mos3MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How has the thought of raising children in your future influenced your career or educational choices?

 @9KZ6MZ4 from California answered…2mos2MO

I want to have children after 30 because that is when I will be financially stable.

 @9KZPLGG from North Carolina disagreed…2mos2MO

We will never be financially stable. There is never a good age, because inflation will continue to raise and the cost of living will be more than a minimum wage.

 @9KZ73P6Independent from Florida answered…2mos2MO

It has greatly influenced me as finding a financially stable job and market is crucial to provide the best life for my kids. The choice of private or public schools is also important as i want enough money to put my kids in private schools to encourage academic success from a young age.

 @9KZ6MSQ from Minnesota answered…2mos2MO

It hasn't influenced my career too much. I'd prefer to work at home when I get children as a computer developer.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…3mos3MO

How would the possibility of having a large family influence the dreams you have for your own future?

 @9KCPS7W  from Ohio answered…3mos3MO

Having a large family would crush my dreams. I dislike children, and never want the responsibility of caring for one. Pronatalist idealogies also would lead to direct discrimination against me and other women with PCOS, as it is harder for them to conceive.

 @9KDCG93Green from California disagreed…3mos3MO

The answer isn't inherently wrong: everyone is different, if you have your reasons for not wanting children then who am I to tell you otherwise? But for me personally, none of my dreams would be crushed by having a family, if anything, they would progress.

 @9KCPSCPRepublican from South Carolina answered…3mos3MO

A large family would possibly slow down my end goal in life depending on when the 'family' starts and my idea is to get to that goal or somewhere that is relatively within grabbing distance before I start a family.

 @9KCPGKL from California answered…3mos3MO

I do feel drawn to have a decent sized family because with all the current individuals choosing against having children, the population will eventually decline.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How do your cultural traditions influence your thoughts on ideal family size?

 @9HL7HFQ from Texas answered…5mos5MO

It is the choice of who is bearing a child. They decide what they would like to do with THEIR body, THEIR future, and THEIR life.

 @9HL7KJJ from Florida answered…5mos5MO

 @9HL7C5Z from California answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

If you were responsible for the well-being of a nation, would you consider natalist policies?

 @9H7FJFMIndependentfrom Northern Mariana Islands answered…6mos6MO

I see no harm in trying to promote population growth in of itself, it just depends what the policies are specifically. I think that allowing more immigrants, providing increased paternity and maternity leave, healthcare coverage, temporary housing, and other such reforms would be best, as simply running ads to encourage people to have more children is pointless.

 @9H7FDV6 from Missouri answered…6mos6MO

no; partners should be the ones to decide how many children to have (or none); government should have no say in this

 @9H7FGHM from Virginia answered…6mos6MO

No, I would promote childbirth but also educate women on the effects it has on life.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you manage the tension between personal freedom and societal expectations regarding family size?

 @9HVHTLF from Kentucky answered…5mos5MO

 @9HVFNQS from Pennsylvania answered…5mos5MO

If the government is gonna give them help they can think about having more babies but if not it's their choices .

 @9HVF73B from Texas answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

How would you navigate your aspirations in a place that prizes parenting above other life achievements?

 @YumiLibertarian  from Indiana answered…5mos5MO

Our priority in life isn’t just reproducing anymore. We have greater and complex things to focus on. Sure, giving life to a person is someones own choice, but it should not be incentivized anymore unless the birth rate is dropping. Humans, both men and women, have gotten far more intelligent. We need to focus on ocean exploration, space exploration, science, math, medicine, anything that helps improve the environment and for people to live in.

 @9HL7LSP from New York answered…5mos5MO

LOL! If only the united states was a natalist country. There are no financial incentives besides a tax deduction, there is not support for child bearers which make up 1/3 of the workforce. Talk to me when there are actual measures in place to support the human reproduction instead of punishing women.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What personal values would you weigh when deciding to start or expand your family amid population policies?

  @jakeeubanks answered…5mos5MO

I feel as though starting a family is up to the people who are doing it. Nothing should be incentivized to make it so that people feel like they need to have children, though.

 @9HMM7V7 from Utah answered…5mos5MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…6mos6MO

What do you think about the ideal number of children for a family being influenced by state policies rather than personal preference?

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...