For instance, if we look back at the Vietnam War, we can see that the extensive involvement of the United States didn't necessarily lead to a desirable outcome. Despite the heavy investment in terms of resources and human life, the conflict ended with the establishment of a communist government in Vietnam, not the democratic one the U.S. had been backing. This historical example could suggest that heavy involvement doesn't always guarantee the result one might hope for. What's your take on how a balance could be achieved between non-interference and necessary intervention?
Be the first to reply to this agreement.