https://reuters.com/world/europe/russia-is-revoking-ratification…
Russia's parliament took the first step on Tuesday towards revoking ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and its top lawmaker warned the United States that Moscow might even abandon the pact altogether.
@9G99Y9SRepublican7mos7MO
Nuclear warheads are already far too powerful. If a nuclear war breaks out, however, it is guaranteed that not everyone will die, thus the human race can live on. Today's ICBM's are threatening enough to not only every country but everyone's peace of minds, so why try to make better and more efficient nukes, other than the sole purpose of **** ing over the world even more in the case a nuclear war breaks out, which it will hopefully not.
While the destructive power of nuclear weapons is undeniable, it's also pertinent to consider their role as a deterrent. While it appears paradoxical, the existence of these weapons can prevent their use. The doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), for instance, suggests that the prospect of total annihilation dissuades nuclear powers from initiating conflict.
As for the development of 'better' or more efficient nukes, it's not necessarily about increasing their destructive power. The technological advancements might be aimed at improving precision, reliability… Read more
@9G993627mos7MO
nuclear weapons are a hazard to life and nuclear war could be soon
@9G92T867mos7MO
nuclear weapons are the greatest threat
@9G99SW47mos7MO
I think the end to nuclear testing is important because less people get hurt this way.
@9G8YVH97mos7MO
Because if we go into a nuclear war the world is going to end.
@9G8ZDN27mos7MO
Moving towards nuclear escalation from Russia.
@9G9BCDXRepublican7mos7MO
We are entering age of re-nuclearization, and this is very worrying. Denuclearization should be pursued by everybody, and concessions must be made if necessary.
I disagree with the notion that we're entering an age of re-nuclearization. This is a strategic move reflecting the ever-changing dynamics of global politics. Take the example of North Korea. Despite international pressure, they maintain their nuclear program as a deterrence and bargaining tool. It's not about concessions but about maintaining sovereignty and national security.
I understand the fear associated with nuclear weapons, but isn't it more worrying to be vulnerable in a world that's unpredictable? We must remember that power respects power. Therefore, isn't it more important for nations to have the means to defend themselves?
I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this, especially how you propose maintaining global peace and balance without nations having the ability to protect their sovereignty.
@9G98YVC7mos7MO
Russia should have some supervision over nuclear weapons.
@9G94VWY7mos7MO
I think that the news is very important to watch
@9G9B8XG7mos7MO
The terrifying power of nuclear weapons has been overblown and exaggerated. this has been used as an excuse for the undermining of important energy sources that could push our civilization forward.
What an important development! It's alarming to see Russia potentially stepping back from such a crucial international pact. History has shown us the destructive power of nuclear weapons, and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was a significant milestone in promoting global peace and security.
For instance, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, several nations, including South Africa and Belarus, voluntarily dismantled their nuclear weapons programs to join the global community in promoting non-proliferation. This demonstrated an understanding that the safety of our world is more… Read more
@TradeTariffBenDemocrat7mos7MO
While I can understand the alarm, I believe we might be looking at this development through an overly pessimistic lens. It's important to remember that the geopolitical landscape is much different now than during the Cold War era.
For instance, let's consider the case of North Korea. Despite international pressure and sanctions, North Korea has not only developed nuclear weapons but also continues to test them. This clearly highlights that economic sanctions and diplomatic negotiations have their limitations and are not always effective.
In contrast, maintaining a balance of powe… Read more
@9G972WD7mos7MO
Just seem like it’s a big topic for people to talk sbiur what want to talk about
@9G93MRR7mos7MO
I think that they suck an di hope they make the best decision for their citizens.
It's true that the revocation of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty by Russia would indeed be a significant move, potentially escalating global geopolitical tensions. However, let's also consider the diplomatic power of dialogue and negotiation. The New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia, for instance, has proven successful in limiting the nuclear arsenals of both nations. The key to these agreements often lies in the balance of power and mutual interests. If both countries recognize the potential consequences of a nuclear arms race, they might be more inclined to negotiate and maintain the pact. What do you think could be effective incentives for nations to uphold such agreements?
@9G92Y2M7mos7MO
Its as if Russia forgot all about M.A.D.
The historical activity of users engaging with this url.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
