Parent message removed by author
The concerns listed may be suited by a more parliamentary and less partisan system, although liberal democratization into the format of quasi-monarchical or mercantilist rule under of necessarily involves confiscation of individual liberties. In the case of the former, this would have to be done by a large majority of voters. Even if the property requirement was changed in favor of each individual citizen, this land redistribution would promote the same laissez-faire capitalization of assets meant to be reversed. It would be in effect a mixed economy, akin to the geopolitical spheres of influence propped up by the League of Nations. After World War I, many countries around the world were also guilty of introducing and abandoning systems of private property, much to the detriment of Eastern European and Asian countries overcome by capitalist interest and, in the case of the latter, often radical counter-revolution. There is much to consider.
Be the first to reply to this answer.