@9HZ8PQZ5mos ago

It would be way better, we wouldn't have to spend money as much, we can direct it to other stuff

▲ 5 ▲Reply to this Agree 1 Disagree •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

1 Reply

@9J2CBVQ from Florida agreed…5mos5MO

If we didn't have to spend so much money on things tat could last as long as they could we could spend on things we need that might not have enough money for.

▲▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link Context •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow 1

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

@9HZ8PQZ

Last activeActivity4 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias6%Active in

PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.