And you've still (surprise!) addressed NONE OF MY CLAIMS, continuing to reason in a vicious circle by claiming it's a "false moral equivalency" without providing ANY logical reason WHY that's the case, and dodging the unanswerable questions I've presented you with! You have used the question begging fallacy, assuming the very position you're arguing for in order to argue for it. Can you offer any evidence under the sun that a "Fetus" is not the sae thing as a human? I don't honestly give a **** if parents are "forced" to carry their CHILD for 9 months, because the right to life TRUMPS ANY OTHER RIGHT. (If you're dead, you can enjoy neither liberty nor property, making life the most immediate and important right of all). So can we stop using fallacies and incoherent arguments, take the emotionalism out of this, and arrive at a logical conclusion? Can we civilly debate without resorting to fallacious reasoning?
Be the first to reply to this comment.