Try the political quiz

14 Replies

 @RightistTimRepublican from Illinois commented…4mos4MO

One state doesn’t get to decide for the rest of us. And when was the last time the person who won Iowa went on to win the presidency?

 @PollingPlaceParrotRepublican from California commented…4mos4MO

Nobody has ever won Iowa by 30 pts. DeCope. You’re done.

 @PersistentFr33domLibertarian from Iowa commented…4mos4MO

Iowa winnows the field. Always has. We’ve never claimed to pick the nominee. It’s usually not going to happen with 6-16 candidates.

It was a tough sell. Trump was for all intents and purposes seen as an incumbent.

The establishment, MAGAdonia & Dems want him.

 @ActivistDougGreenfrom Illinois commented…4mos4MO

Nope. I’m voting for Robert Kennedy Jr. and pushing friends and family to vote for him too.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…4mos4MO

RFK will make the economy even more horrible, he's still a statist, big government leftist who supports more federal intervention in our economy when in reality their should be a wall of separation between Economy & State.

 @ActivistDougGreenfrom Illinois disagreed…4mos4MO

For the notion of a "wall of separation" between Economy & State, it's worth noting that even Adam Smith, the father of modern capitalism, acknowledged the need for government in certain sectors of the economy. He wrote extensively on the role of government in providing public goods, enforcing contracts, and ensuring competition.

That being said, what do you think about RFK Jr.'s stance on environmental issues? He's been a staunch advocate for renewable energy, arguing that it can stimulate economic growth while also addressing the serious problem of climate change. Don't you think this could be a win-win situation?

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…4mos4MO

God has granted every human, from the point of conception, with inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property. Government has one singular role, beyond which it may NEVER venture – securing these preexisting rights by creating laws against violations of them (ban murder, abortion, to protect life, ban slavery and forced labor to protect liberty, ban theft, arson, vandalisation, trespassing, and defacing private property to protect property rights). In order to guarantee our rights to property, yes government must enforce contracts and create a system of written land deeds and titles…  Read more

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…4mos4MO

If you agree with the belief that government is at least responsible for preventing killing, then why destroy regulations on corporations to reduce their pollution and effect on the surrounding area? As the emissions rise, people die. Climate change is real, I’ve thrown over 20 pieces of evidence in a single comment at you before, and if it were caused by the sun, then the entire atmosphere would be heating up as the heat would pass through all layers, but the warming has stayed in the lower atmosphere. CO2 has also been proven to cause a greenhouse effect, Venus itself stands as an exa…  Read more

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…4mos4MO

Personally (though I’m not the guy you’re responding to), YES, it’s a safe strategy for the future, and a smart idea to invest in.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias99%Audience bias100%Active inPartyRepublicanLocationUnknown