So what's next? When a woman ovulates and doesn't conceive, she's killed an egg that could become a baby?

Apparently you lack either a basic understanding of this ruling OR the IQ level to understand its implications. This is not about calling women murderers who have a miscarriage, or any of that, nor does any conservative or sensible person in this country claim or imply that. This is about experimentation with human embryos in labs for profit. It's shutting down, and rightfully and justly shutting down, an industry that has moral implications of infinite importance. If the embryo is not a baby, what is it? What moral value does it have? Does it have more moral value than a leaf? Why or…  Read more why not? And if you don't know what moral value it has, or don't know what it even is, or how you should think about it – why take the risk of having people experiment with it? If the question is morally and scientifically ambiguous – the only ethical position is the assume is it a human being because it COULD be a human being. That's the only ethical position. If you disagree, I want specifics - why would it not be the only moral position? Why? Please answer these questions, because I am genuinely curious about what the Marxist Death Cult that supports abortion thinks about embryos, and why. Maybe someone here can help me out a little.