Try the political quiz

10 Replies

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia disagreed…3mos3MO

Yet they are still allowed to marry and do whatever they want with one another, so your problem isn’t the functionality, it’s the gender, which, once again, Christian belief cannot dictate in government as neither its religious texts, nor are the basic ideals of not favoring any religion are allowed to be attacked as of now, nor should they be at any time. One’s religion doesn’t have the power to dictate laws over others who believe in other religions with different values than yours, unless it is directly hurting fully grown humans with constitutional rights, as preve…  Read more

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington disagreed…3mos3MO

Christianity, as the only logical possibility, should dictate in some form or another our laws because we know we can expect success from laws corresponding with Biblical values.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia disagreed…3mos3MO

We tried that and it just became a theocracy, hence the Holy Roman Empire, Spain, Britain, etc, they all evolved far past simply favoring a religion, because religion is an extremely useful tool that can be warped far easier than any other ideal. It’s also generally not fair to those who don’t believe in Christianity, so the law, regardless of what 200 men thought, should revolve around favoring none, and protecting all.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington disagreed…3mos3MO

Great! Then it's time to remove evolution and the Big Bang from school textbooks, and stop showing favouritism to secularism, gender ideology, and socialism!

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia disagreed…3mos3MO

Evolution is quite literally science, and a heavily proven science at that. It happens on the macro and micro scale, that’s been empirically proven, what religious types tend to hate about evolution is the claim that humans had a common ancestor with apes, which isn’t really a necessary thing to mention if we HAVE TO change it.

The Big Bang is merely the most likely and proven theory of the universe so far, and rejecting it in science classes is both unscientific and unnecessary, since it’s a common consensus that’s open to scientific change, not a solidified fact quit…  Read more

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this disagreement.

Last activeActivity1,418 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias31%Active inPartyConstitutionLocationUnknown