Which political ideology do you most identify with?
It is a religion in the sense that it takes, on faith, the notion that human beings are electrified…
Fairh isn’t a thing in science, proof is, and if there’s enough satisfactory proof, then that tends to convince people to believe a theory. The Big Bang has the most physical and tangible proof of any theory of the universe, and as such, is considered the most likely option, therefore, what’s most likely is what’s taught. The “missionaries” are normally what you call teachers, you know, the people who already live and work around the school being taught at. You say it like teachers just walk up to random religious groups then start reading scientific textbooks, when the direct opposite is far more common. High ranking “churchmen” are scientists who’ve helped them formulate and refine useful and reliable theories, such as thaf of evolution, general relativity, the creation of nuclear weapons, or rocket science. These guys aren’t “churchmen”, they’re just important people, same way as a president or a notable character in a show. Rejection of the common narrative without any real proof that’s capable of taking down current theories tends to lead to merely being discredited. Settled science being rejected leads to losing your license, because that information is obviously false. Skeptics aren’t the problem, disinformers are. Scientists are allowed to disagree on climate change, they just need proof in their side. Scientists that fake their credentials, fail to cite sources, and use bad methods of getting a result are often the ones kicked out, the same way as an unruly worker.
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
Oh don't stop talking – enlighten me! If the Big Bang has physical and tangible PROOF, provide it now. In fact, since you've made that claim, you essentially lose this debate if you CAN'T prove it. Oh, and PROVE Evolution. Do both please. I've PROVEN Christianity, let's see if you can even provide any significant EVIDENCE for your materialistic perspective.
@9CJ6CB62mos2MO
For the Big Bang, there’s the observable fact that the universe itself is expanding, as differences between galaxies and other galaxies has been increasing via some unknown force, often considered to be the expansion of the universe aided by dark energy pushing things apart. There’s also the stretching of light between different galaxies when it reaches us. The light, though it’s from different times, doesn’t match to it’s original distance, and stretches in weird ways to sort of give us glimpses of different times in space at the same time, showing that these… Read more
@Patriot-#1776Constitution2mos2MO
For the Big Bang, there’s the observable fact that the universe itself is expanding, as differences between galaxies and other galaxies has been increasing via some unknown force, often considered to be the expansion of the universe aided by dark energy pushing things apart.
Which, in and of itself, proves absolutely nothing. The fact that the universe is expanding which creationist welcome and accept, is not proof that with zero fuel, oxygen, heat, and even space in which to exist, an explosion of absolutely nothing created all the matter in the universe, a hypothetical event that would… Read more
