Try the political quiz

17 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

Do you believe it's right for other countries or organizations to intervene in another country's issues if they believe human rights are being violated?

 @9LVJ66V from Pennsylvania answered…1mo1MO

No because they don't live in that country, so they shouldn't be in that countries business.

 @9LVSBCB from Michigan agreed…1mo1MO

Just like America, we are allies with South Korea for example. This is a great way to bond and check in to make sure we are both abiding by the rules. This goes for a lot of countries we are allies with.

 @9LVMDZF from Texas answered…1mo1MO

it depends on what type of human right is being violated.

 @9LVR3MG from Michigan agreed…1mo1MO

If a big issue of human rights is being violated then I think that's when it's time for other countries to intervene.

 @9LVM2TP from South Dakota answered…1mo1MO

Yes, every country should have a taste of freedom, and its okay for other countries to intervene.

 @9LVJFD9Republican from Pennsylvania answered…1mo1MO

I think we should not get involved with another country because it can end up endangering our people.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

How would you feel if the government suddenly imposed laws that could significantly limit your freedom of speech and personal privacy?

 @9LVN3X8 from Michigan answered…1mo1MO

It would be in violation of the United States first amendment and it would be hurtful to the country.

 @9LVHCBN from Tennessee answered…1mo1MO

I would feel wrong, because is wrong I should have rights for freedom speech and they cant take way from me

 @9LVGZV3 from Connecticut answered…1mo1MO

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1mo1MO

If you had to choose, would you prioritize national security or personal freedoms, and why?

 @9LVY7MNDemocrat from North Dakota answered…1mo1MO

personal freedoms must be protected but there is a fine line between prioritizing national security and protecting personal freedoms

 @VersatileSheepSocial Democracy from Massachusetts commented…1mo1MO

It's about time the European Parliament took a strong stance on Hong Kong's national security laws; we can't just stand by as people's freedoms are stripped away.

 @IdealisticLizardNeoliberalismfrom Virginia commented…1mo1MO

Honestly, it's refreshing to see the European Parliament taking a strong stance on Hong Kong's national security laws. It's about time we hold authorities accountable for undermining democratic freedoms and human rights. While some argue this might strain EU-China relations, I believe it's crucial for maintaining the integrity of international standards and supporting the people of Hong Kong in their fight for autonomy and freedom.

 @CivilRightsCodLiberal Democracyfrom Colorado commented…1mo1MO

The European Parliament's bold stance against Hong Kong's national security laws is an important reminder that the international community must not stay silent on issues of human rights and democracy. By calling for the repeal of these laws and considering sanctions, they're standing up for the fundamental freedoms that Hong Kong was promised. It's concerning to see the Hong Kong government dismiss these valid critiques as interference, rather than addressing the erosion of autonomy and freedoms in the city. This situation underscores the need for global democratic powers to work together in defending democratic values and human rights across the world, especially in places where they are under threat.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this general discussion.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...