Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
@9MRFP831wk1W
Yes, but when the meat is sold it should be required to disclose that it is lab grown as well as undergo several chemical tests.
@9MQ8Z961wk1W
Yes, but only after extensive testing has been performed and verified in a triple blind study performed by an independent org that is verifiably not bought out by a party of interest.
@LucidLibertarian 14hrs14H
Yes, but producers should be required to fully disclose the meat is lab-grown and pay for outside organizations to publish any health risks that become known or associated with lab-grown meat.
@9NBP7J7Justice party member1 day1D
YES BUT they must provide very clear and easy to notices messages in the advertisement that labels the product as a lab-grown meat
@9NBJDXR1 day1D
Instead, The government should ban unethical animal farming and require all meat to be sustained ethically.
@jwolfsg1590Constitution 1 day1D
Soylent Green is people!
@9N9JNPN2 days2D
I believe lab grown meat should be allowed but by no means pushed or promoted by the government. I think clear labels on all products using lab grown should be required.
@9N9GCLZWomen’s Equality2 days2D
If the meat is lab-grown it should be labeled as such. Whatever was used to grow the meat should be on the label.
@9N9DTCT2 days2D
Only once it has been proven to be safe for consumption by federal regulators AND a detached third party scientific organization.
@9N8YXF22 days2D
Lab grown meat should be regulated. Privatization of nutritional growth should be allowed to be privatized, organic growth is a slippery slope.
@9N8XZVD2 days2D
Yes, but without subsidies and without calling it meat. It must be labeled as "lab-grown" or "fake" meat. Also, this should be decided at the state level.
@9N8XVGK2 days2D
Yes, but only with strict oversight and regulation by the FDA to establish standards for lab-grown meat sold in the US.
@9N8JFLXRepublican2 days2D
Yes, and let the consumer decide. The producers of lab-grown meat must clearly state the nutritional information and ingredients.
@9N7SV2S3 days3D
Yes, but only after thorough research into the long lasting effects on our health, and with frequent and consistent testing to ensure quality and safety of the meat before being sold.
@9N7NRC33 days3D
The government should allow the market to determine this, and not position itself as for our against at any level.
@9N6K8JM3 days3D
Yes, but only with those companies wishing to take part being required to collectively fund an independent oversight of such to test and monitor any long term effects.
@9N694LC4 days4D
Yeah, but I feel like it shouldn't be a complete replacement if it doesn't end up being all that great.
@9N5T2SW4 days4D
if it proves to provide no detrimental health defects and provides the standard nutrients as natural meat
@9N5JXC94 days4D
If it can compete on the market without subsidy or regulation again Brady it's competitors, then so be it.
@9N552QS4 days4D
Yes, but only with careful regulation & enforcement far in excess of animal-grown meat requirements, and only for the lowest rungs of society, such as the homeless.
With strict regulations and HARSH penalties including a $999,000,000,000,000,000,000 fine per violation.
@db4 days4D
It should be allowed just like raw milk, drugs, etc. the free market should decide, and hopefully bankrupt it.
@9N4HDRQ4 days4D
More studies need to be done on this before commercialization - how will this effect carbon emissions? how will this effect animal populations? what is the cost of producing lab-grown meat versus maintaining meat production from animals?
More research is required, but to fight world hunger it’s a good idea but could be devastating for farmers and other food production.
@9N379FJ5 days5D
As long as it is labeled as lab-grown. Consumers can choose vat grown meat or not, as they choose any other meat alternative.
@9N2WC4X5 days5D
No, we already have enough health issues due to human altering of food sources. We need to get back to the basics in our country.
@9N2N5F45 days5D
No, the current meat industry is sufficient enough in providing food. We don't need any new alternatives right now.
@9MYMGYN6 days6D
Yes, but only after significant testing for possible unknown health problems are explored. Possibly 5 years of testing before moving forward.
@9MW35WN1wk1W
Yes, but there needs to be strong restrictions in place. Prohibit the production of artificial human flesh meant for consumption. Restaurants, grocers, and other food providers should also have to clearly disclose on menus and packaging that artificial mean is being used. All artificial meat should be inspected and held to the highest safety standards.
@9MTZNC41wk1W
Yes, after its safety is scientifically confirmed to ensure it carries no potential long-term health issues
@9MNXHHZ1wk1W
As long as it is clearly stated on the package that it is lab grown and more research into what impacts it has
@9MNKM6BIndependent2wks2W
Yes, but the process of how it's produced should be shown to the public.
@9MNFRVY2wks2W
Yes as long as it goes through rigorous trials and testing
@9MN7DQSIndependent 2wks2W
There need to be strict regulations on harmful ingredients not for human consumption
@9MN8PN3 2wks2W
So long as laboratories can prove that lab-grown meat is perfectly safe for human consumption with little to no long term effects, I'm okay with it.
@Deep_Fried_MilkSocialist 2wks2W
As long as it is a viable and cost-effective method of obtaining meat and as long as it is advertised as lab grown.
@9MN22WH2wks2W
Yes, but it has to be clearly stated on the packaging and there has to be published researched
@9MMZWFR2wks2W
no because that can make us sick and our odys can change
@9MMZ7PD2wks2W
It depends on how the meat was made. If the meat is safe to eat then they can regulate it.
@9K99V29 2wks2W
Yes, but not without strict regulation and research
@9MMRW4T2wks2W
Wait to see what the long-term health effects are.
@9MMQPLY2wks2W
Regardless, things like food shouldn’t be commodities to be commercialized in the first place
@SenBR2003 2wks2W
Yes, but companies should be required to label packages containing lab-grown meat.
@JcawolfsonIndependent 2wks2W
Yes, but there must be some oversight to ensure food safety, and we mustn’t permit false advertising
Yes, but each state should be informed of the pros and cons of voting for it.
@9MM66NS2wks2W
I think it would be a good for option for vegans that dont get the proteins and fats in meats but many people probably just wouldn’t rat it over the preference of real meats
@9MM62KY2wks2W
It depends. If the meat is just a cheap and unhealthy way to get around real meat, especially if it isn't properly advertised as fake meat and instead advertised as real meat when it isn't, it should not be allowed. Although, if it is a proper and morally good meat alternative, labeled as a meat alternative, then it should be allowed
@9MM3ZSD2wks2W
Depends on the safty and effets they have on humans but if its fine then sure.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
