The British monarch is limited to non-partisan functions such as bestowing honours, appointing the Prime Minister, and by tradition is commander-in-chief of the British Armed Forces. Though the ultimate formal executive authority over the government is still through the monarch's royal prerogative, these powers may only be used according to laws enacted in Parliament and within the constraints of convention and precedent.
@8T3M48Q3yrs3Y
No way, they are a positive influence on tourism, charity, and international relations but they should be self funded and pay taxes but only provide financial support for immediate heirs to the throne but reduce their funding
@8RJLGHZ3yrs3Y
No, they should also be given more powers within the government.
@8QB2G243yrs3Y
No, but select a new royal house.
@8HTMB5M4yrs4Y
No, but they should be self-funded, have to pay taxes, and hold no political power.
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO