Try the political quiz
+

Sort by

Filters

Discussions tagged as:

Choose more filters:

Options

 @9MB4CGY from Ohio answered…3hrs3H

Our government under bush administration committed the terrorist attack that is known as 9/11 so this question is irrele…

 @9M9ZZQL from California answered…6hrs6H

Yes, if they have definite proof of a terrorist activity taking place. Proof that cannot be refuted in court.

 @9M9ZMGH from Oklahoma answered…6hrs6H

Yes, as long it is short term. Otherwise if it is a long term operation Congress should have the option to approve the m…

 @9M9XZTW from Virginia answered…8hrs8H

Only a limited operation should be conducted without congressional approval. Any war would require the support of Congre…

 @9M9RCWZ from Texas answered…12hrs12H

Both need to decide on that. And make an agreement. As long as no one gets hurt or killed depending on what action they'…

 @9M9NPTH from New York answered…14hrs14H

The president should be able to go behind congress's back if action isn’t made fast enough nor with some sort of biparti…

 @9M9NN8K from North Carolina answered…14hrs14H

The president should be able to use military power for certain dangerous situations, but congress should still be notifi…

 @9M9NLWS from Oregon answered…14hrs14H

It really depends on the president or officials of congress at the time for something like this to be a actual question

 @9M9M77M from Missouri answered…14hrs14H

Yes, but they should not be allowed to use boots on the ground and they must have permission of the local government.

 @9M9FTMY from Texas answered…16hrs16H

Depending on the timing if Congress is intentionally taking a long time to approve I say we should move forward without…

 @9M9F7R9 from Utah answered…17hrs17H

In certain circumstances yes, because you can't really on Congress to always do what's right, the 2 party system is garb…

 @9M9CLJD from Pennsylvania answered…17hrs17H

It should depend on the situation, if Al-Quada is planning is attack very soon, then asking congress for approval would…

 @9M9BX5P from Ohio answered…17hrs17H

this also depends like if its a dier need for the president to do that then yes but other than dier needs no.

 @9M98YFV answered…18hrs18H

Yes, the President should be able to act quickly to prevent an immediate or impending attack on us, but Congress must be…

 @9M972GC from Arkansas answered…19hrs19H

The War Powers Resolution Act already addresses the restrictions of the President deploying armed forces without Congres…