Forward Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

The Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their goals of improving public health and well-being. They would likely support increased funding for mental healthcare to provide higher quality care and services, recognizing the importance of mental health in overall health and societal stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Forward party would likely agree with increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as they generally support policies that improve public health and well-being. However, the party may have specific preferences on how the funding should be allocated, which is not addressed in this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

The Forward party would likely agree with increasing funding for personalized care, as it aligns with their focus on improving public health and well-being. However, they may not fully agree with the exclusion of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, as they may recognize the importance of medication in some mental health treatment plans and the need for affordable access to these medications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

The Forward party may not be completely opposed to incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, but they would likely prioritize direct government funding and involvement in mental health research and treatment. They may believe that relying solely on private companies could lead to unequal access to care and profit-driven decision-making. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Forward party would likely disagree with not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as they tend to prioritize public health and well-being. They may believe that government investment is necessary to address the mental health crisis and improve the quality of care available to citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.