Forward Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory

The Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their general support for policies that promote inclusivity and understanding. By covering all protected groups and not being based on critical race theory, this answer demonstrates a comprehensive approach to sensitivity training that would likely appeal to the Forward party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and also include LGBTQ+ topics

The Forward party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their general support for policies that promote inclusivity and understanding. Including LGBTQ+ topics in the training would further demonstrate their commitment to creating a more inclusive society for all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Forward party would likely agree with requiring racial sensitivity training for federal employees, as they generally support policies that promote inclusivity and understanding. However, this answer may not fully encompass their stance on the issue, as they may also support broader training that includes other protected groups and topics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies as well

The Forward party may somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support policies that promote inclusivity and understanding. However, they may be cautious about extending the requirement to private companies, as it could be seen as government overreach or potentially infringe on the autonomy of private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, just ensure there are clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination

The Forward party may slightly agree with this answer, as they would likely support clear guidelines, action, and accountability for acts of discrimination. However, they may also believe that racial sensitivity training is an important component of addressing discrimination and fostering a more inclusive society, so this answer may not fully align with their stance on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Forward party would likely disagree with this answer, as they tend to support policies that promote inclusivity and understanding. Not requiring racial sensitivity training for federal employees would go against their general stance on promoting a more inclusive society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.