Converation thread

The following is a 3 message exchange between 4 users

@C1vilRightsKangaroo from Washington D.C. disagreed…11mos11MO

How is that a 4th amendment violation? That doesn't mean what you think it means.

▲ 4 ▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

@ChameleonPiper from Virginia disagreed…11mos11MO

Unlawful search.

▲ 4 ▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

@DeterminedDelegatefrom Virginia disagreed…11mos11MO

Its not unlawful. Amazon, which owns the information, voluntarily gave it to law enforcement. The 4th amendment is only triggered if it is involuntary. And sometimes, under the "3rd party doctrine" it can be involuntarily seized if information is owned by 3rd party i.e. Amazon

▲ 2 ▲Reply to this Agree Disagree Link •••Tell me more React Request reference + My feed Mute author Follow

Discussions

Voter guides

Data & analytics

Candidates

About

United States Speaking English

iSideWith.com

iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.

Email Twitter Facebook YouTube Podcast Patreon

I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.

© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.