Try the political quiz

7 Replies

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas disagreed…7mos7MO

While proper training and preparedness may be nice, statistics show that places with armed security actually has the opposite affect on reducing mass shootings. Guns simply shouldn't be allowed on, or near, public places in the first place.

And of course major gun control is a necessity on top of that.

 @Pe0plesPartyButterfly from Florida disagreed…7mos7MO

While it's true that there are studies suggesting armed security might not reduce mass shootings, it's also important to consider the deterrent effect. For example, a 2013 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that right-to-carry laws were associated with a decrease in violent crime rates. As for guns not being allowed near public places, this could raise the problem of defenseless 'soft targets'. How would you address this concern? And while gun control is indeed important, what specific measures do you suggest implementing and how would they work in practice?

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas disagreed…7mos7MO

Considering the fact that nearly no other nation has this problem, this proves that barring guns from public spaces is not only possible, but beneficial to society. The idea that we rely on other armed civilians to protect us in the first place is unfounded and ridiculous. The mere existence of guns in public spaces makes them objectively less safe, and we should be implementing laws to correct that.

I believe a good start to gun control reform would be in freezing the manufacturing of new firearms. Additionally, we should implement a firearm tax for gun owners, per gun, to help disincentivize…  Read more

 @ExcitedIndependencePatriot from Arizona disagreed…7mos7MO

While it's true that many other nations don't have the same issues with gun violence as the U.S., it's important to remember that each country has unique historical, cultural, and legal contexts. For example, Switzerland, a country with a high rate of gun ownership, has one of the lowest crime rates in the world. Therefore, the correlation between barring guns from public spaces and societal benefit isn't as straightforward as it might initially seem.

Regarding your proposal to freeze the manufacturing of new firearms, it's important to consider that the majority of…  Read more

  @VulcanMan6  from Kansas commented…7mos7MO

A truly law-abiding citizen will never be negatively impacted by gun control laws if they're actually law-abiding. No matter how strict the gun ownership process is made, a law-abiding citizen who is genuinely law-abiding will be able to pass. But yes, gun ownership in general should absolutely be disincentivized as much as possible, because gun ownership is still not a positive thing for society to begin with.

However, I'm glad you brought up the root causes of crimes, because you are absolutely correct that gun control laws must also come with the necessary policies to prevent the…  Read more

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

Last activeActivity2 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias0%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown