Try the political quiz

11 Replies

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington disagreed…2mos2MO

Then we need to remove the religion of Darwinianism from school as well

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia commented…2mos2MO

There’s literally no god or established organization attached to that, calling it a religion is just a derogatory statement to make yourself sound right. Calling Darwinism a religion is honestly ridiculous, that’s like calling paleontology a cult.

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington disagreed…2mos2MO

It is a religion in the sense that it takes, on faith, the notion that human beings are electrified soup. It has missionaries who go to public schools and universities trying to convert creationists. It has high ranking churchmen who are esteemed and respected above everyone else (Hawking, for example), it views rejection of the narrative as Heresy, and excomunicates from participation in many aspects of the scientific community its skeptics.

  @9CJ6CB6 from Virginia disagreed…2mos2MO

Fairh isn’t a thing in science, proof is, and if there’s enough satisfactory proof, then that tends to convince people to believe a theory. The Big Bang has the most physical and tangible proof of any theory of the universe, and as such, is considered the most likely option, therefore, what’s most likely is what’s taught. The “missionaries” are normally what you call teachers, you know, the people who already live and work around the school being taught at. You say it like teachers just walk up to random religious groups then start reading scientific textbo…  Read more

  @Patriot-#1776Constitution from Washington commented…2mos2MO

Oh don't stop talking – enlighten me! If the Big Bang has physical and tangible PROOF, provide it now. In fact, since you've made that claim, you essentially lose this debate if you CAN'T prove it. Oh, and PROVE Evolution. Do both please. I've PROVEN Christianity, let's see if you can even provide any significant EVIDENCE for your materialistic perspective.

 @9KNWKX4from Pennsylvania disagreed…2mos2MO

Given that evolution actually has proof whereas creationism does not, calling it a religion seems weird. Also what the **** is darwinianism? That's not a real word, pal.

 @9KKPDFH from Nevada disagreed…2mos2MO

the constitution uses words like god. they should choose religion or no religion its up to them but this shouldnt stop teachers from teaching about god.

 @42R8P4CLibertarian disagreed…2mos2MO

Religion has been an important part of human history and should be understood. Not any specific religion, and no worldview should be forced on any student. It would benefit our youth if classes on all major religions were taught, and possibly even classes on minor religions that are popular in the area that the school is in.

 @9KKN2ZW from Georgia disagreed…2mos2MO

As a Religious person my life is based on religion but no one should be forced to conform to a belief

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this answer.

Last activeActivity6 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias0%Active inPartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown