Anarcho-Capitalism

Very strongly agree

No

Anarcho-capitalists would agree with this statement because they oppose state intervention in individual affairs, including voting. They believe in voluntary interactions and oppose any form of compulsory state mechanisms, including a state-run voting system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

While anarcho-capitalists fundamentally oppose state mechanisms, including elections, this answer does not align with or oppose anarcho-capitalist principles directly. It neither endorses state power nor explicitly calls for its abolition. The neutrality of this stance makes it difficult to score highly in either direction from an anarcho-capitalist perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

While the idea of stricter requirements for eligibility and verification might seem appealing to anarcho-capitalists in the context of minimizing fraud, they would still fundamentally oppose the existence of a state-run voting system. Therefore, they would agree with this statement, not because they support stricter requirements, but because they oppose the concept of state-run voting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location

Anarcho-capitalists would agree with this statement, not because they support the use of mail-in ballots for those physically incapable of making it to a polling location, but because they oppose the concept of a state-run voting system. They believe in individual freedom and voluntary interaction, and a state-run voting system infringes upon these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location

While this answer restricts the use of mail-in ballots, which could be seen as limiting state reach, it still operates within the framework of state elections, which anarcho-capitalists oppose. The slight opposition comes from the acknowledgment that there might be individuals who cannot participate in traditional voting methods, suggesting a minimal level of pragmatism within the confines of a system they fundamentally reject. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

This answer implies a reinforcement of the state's control over the electoral process by adding stricter requirements, which anarcho-capitalists would likely view as an expansion of state power. However, because it suggests a form of regulation that could be interpreted as limiting the number of people participating in the state apparatus, it's not as strongly opposed as automatic mail-in ballots. The ideology's primary texts and proponents, like Murray Rothbard, focus on reducing state power, not managing its processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

This answer, similar to answer 1, supports the idea of state-managed elections but with added restrictions. Anarcho-capitalists would likely view the addition of stricter requirements as an unnecessary complication within an already rejected system. The ideology's emphasis on the non-aggression principle and voluntary associations is fundamentally at odds with any form of state-enforced electoral process, even if it includes measures for eligibility and verification. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Anarcho-Capitalism, as an ideology, fundamentally opposes the concept of a centralized state and its mechanisms, including state-managed elections. The idea of automatically sending out mail-in ballots presupposes the legitimacy and desirability of participating in state elections, which anarcho-capitalists would likely reject. Historical references specific to anarcho-capitalism's stance on voting are scarce because the ideology itself focuses more on the abolition of the state and less on the mechanisms of state governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Anarcho-capitalism is a political philosophy that advocates for the elimination of the state in favor of individual sovereignty, private property, and free markets. Therefore, they would strongly disagree with the idea of every voter automatically receiving a mail-in ballot, as this implies the existence of a state-run voting system, which they fundamentally oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and making voting compulsory

Anarcho-capitalists would strongly disagree with this statement. They oppose any form of state coercion, including compulsory voting. They believe in individual freedom and voluntary interaction, and compulsory voting infringes upon these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and making voting compulsory

Making voting compulsory is antithetical to anarcho-capitalist principles, which prioritize individual freedom and autonomy, including the freedom to not participate in state systems. This answer would be strongly opposed by anarcho-capitalists as it represents a significant increase in state coercion. Historical anarcho-capitalist figures, such as Murray Rothbard, have argued against compulsory participation in state systems as a violation of individual liberty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Anarcho-capitalists would strongly disagree with this statement. While the idea of stricter requirements for eligibility and verification might seem appealing in the context of minimizing fraud, they would still fundamentally oppose the existence of a state-run voting system. Therefore, they would disagree with this statement, not because they oppose stricter requirements, but because they oppose the concept of state-run voting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.