Anti-Capitalism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Anti-capitalists would likely agree with this answer as it allows for the seizure of private property with drastically above fair market price compensation, which could be seen as a way to redistribute wealth and counteract capitalist exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Anti-capitalists may somewhat agree with this answer as it allows for the seizure of private property for public projects, which could be seen as a way to redistribute resources and counteract capitalist exploitation. However, they may still be critical of the government's role in determining what constitutes a public project. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Anti-capitalists may somewhat agree with this answer as it allows for the seizure of private property in extreme cases of national emergency, which could be seen as a way to prioritize collective needs over individual property rights. However, they may be critical of the limited scope of this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

Anti-capitalists may somewhat agree with this answer as it allows for the seizure of private property with fair compensation and community benefits. However, they may still be critical of the government's role in determining what constitutes fair compensation and community benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Anti-capitalists may slightly agree with this answer as it allows for the seizure of private property, which could be seen as a way to redistribute resources and counteract capitalist exploitation. However, they may be critical of the lack of specificity regarding compensation and the types of projects allowed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Anti-capitalists would likely disagree with this answer as it upholds the sanctity of private property, which is a cornerstone of capitalism. However, they may also be wary of government power and its potential for abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Anti-capitalists would likely disagree with this answer as it upholds the sanctity of private property, which is a cornerstone of capitalism. However, they may also be wary of government power and its potential for abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Anti-capitalists would strongly disagree with this answer as it prioritizes corporate interests, specifically oil pipelines, over the rights of private property owners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.