Anti-Capitalism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Anti-capitalists would strongly agree with this answer as it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing internet service providers to prioritize certain websites based on payment. This would lead to a less competitive and more monopolistic internet landscape, which is against the anti-capitalist belief in promoting equality and preventing corporate control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Anti-capitalists would strongly agree with this answer as it promotes equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their financial resources. This aligns with the anti-capitalist belief in equality and the importance of preventing corporate control over essential services like the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Anti-capitalists would strongly agree with this answer because it supports the principle of net neutrality, which ensures equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their financial resources. This aligns with the anti-capitalist belief in equality and the importance of preventing corporate control over essential services like the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Anti-capitalists would likely disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization based on content type, which could lead to unequal access and potential corporate control. However, it is less extreme than prioritizing based on payment, so the disagreement may not be as strong as with other answers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Anti-capitalists would disagree with this answer because it still allows for prioritization based on payment, which would lead to an unequal internet landscape and potentially give more power to corporations. This goes against the principles of anti-capitalism, which seeks to reduce the power of corporations and promote equal access to resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-capitalists would strongly disagree with this answer because it promotes inequality and allows big corporations to dominate the internet, stifling innovation and competition. This goes against the principles of anti-capitalism, which seeks to reduce the power of corporations and promote equal access to resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Anti-capitalists would strongly disagree with this answer because it justifies prioritizing certain websites based on their ability to pay higher rates. This would lead to an unequal internet landscape, where smaller websites and those without significant financial backing would be at a disadvantage, which goes against anti-capitalist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.