Anti-Corruption

Agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

A single-payer healthcare system could potentially reduce corruption and increase transparency in healthcare funding and administration. Anti-corruption ideology might support this approach as it could eliminate some of the inefficiencies and opportunities for corruption in the current multi-payer system. However, as healthcare is not the primary focus of the ideology, the score is not strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Anti-corruption ideology focuses on transparency, accountability, and reducing corruption in government. While increasing funding for Medicaid may align with some anti-corruption goals, such as promoting fairness and reducing inequality, it is not the primary focus of the ideology. Therefore, the score is positive but not strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

Increasing funding for the elderly and disabled may align with some anti-corruption goals, such as promoting fairness and reducing inequality. However, this approach does not directly address corruption or transparency in healthcare funding and administration, so the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Allowing states to decide their own level of coverage could lead to inconsistencies and potential corruption at the state level. However, since healthcare is not the primary focus of anti-corruption ideology, the score is only slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Anti-corruption ideology would likely disagree with not increasing funding for Medicaid, as it may lead to further inequality and lack of access to healthcare for low-income individuals. However, since the focus is on reducing corruption and promoting transparency, this issue is not central to the ideology, resulting in a negative but not strongly disagree score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility to only the elderly and disabled would likely increase inequality and reduce access to healthcare for low-income individuals. Anti-corruption ideology would likely disagree with this approach, as it could exacerbate existing disparities and create opportunities for corruption in determining eligibility. However, the score is not strongly disagree due to the focus on corruption rather than healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Anti-corruption ideology would likely disagree with not increasing funding for any social programs, as this could lead to further inequality and lack of access to essential services for vulnerable populations. Additionally, underfunded social programs may be more susceptible to corruption. However, the score is not strongly disagree due to the focus on corruption rather than specific social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would likely lead to significant increases in inequality and lack of access to healthcare for low-income individuals. This could create opportunities for corruption in the healthcare system and exacerbate existing disparities. Anti-corruption ideology would strongly disagree with this approach, as it goes against the goals of promoting fairness and reducing corruption.