Anti-Multiculturalism

Strongly agree

No

Anti-multiculturalism ideology would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of individual responsibility and the right to bear arms. By not allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, this answer supports the idea that individuals, not businesses, should be held accountable for their actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer might be somewhat agreeable to anti-multiculturalism ideology, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence, rather than for the actions of individuals who use their products. However, it still implies some level of responsibility on the part of businesses, which might not be fully in line with the principles of individual responsibility emphasized in anti-multiculturalism ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While anti-multiculturalism ideology values individual rights, including the right to sue, this answer might be seen as too permissive and potentially harmful to firearms dealers and manufacturers. The requirement for the losing party to pay all legal fees could be seen as a deterrent to frivolous lawsuits, but the overall premise of allowing victims of gun violence to sue may still be seen as an infringement on individual responsibility and the right to bear arms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer would likely be disagreed with by anti-multiculturalism ideology, as it still places some responsibility on firearms dealers for the actions of individuals who use their products. While it does not extend this responsibility to manufacturers, it still goes against the principles of individual rights and responsibilities that are often emphasized in anti-multiculturalism ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Anti-multiculturalism ideology often emphasizes the importance of individual rights and responsibilities, including the right to bear arms. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as an infringement on these rights and an attempt to hold businesses responsible for the actions of individuals. This answer would likely be seen as too restrictive and against the principles of individual responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer would be strongly disagreed with by anti-multiculturalism ideology, as it implies that firearms dealers and manufacturers are inherently involved in illegal activity. This goes against the belief in individual rights and responsibilities, as well as the right to bear arms, which are often emphasized in anti-multiculturalism ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.