Preserving the original principles of a political or social movement to prevent dilution or distortion of its core values and goals.
AR>AR ChatGPTYes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits |
Anti-Revisionism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
Anti-revisionists may agree with this answer because it not only supports term limits but also calls for reducing the financial incentives for members of Congress. This could be seen as a way to promote a more egalitarian society and prevent the entrenchment of political elites, which would be in line with Marxist-Leninist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
Anti-revisionists may agree with this answer because term limits could help prevent corruption and promote a more democratic system, which would be in line with Marxist-Leninist principles. However, this issue is not central to anti-revisionism, so the agreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Anti-revisionism is primarily concerned with opposing changes to Marxist-Leninist principles. While term limits for members of Congress are not directly related to this ideology, some anti-revisionists may support term limits as a way to prevent the entrenchment of political elites and promote a more democratic system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate
Anti-revisionists may have a slight agreement with this answer because it supports term limits for the House, which could help prevent the entrenchment of political elites and promote a more democratic system. However, the lack of term limits for the Senate may be seen as a deviation from Marxist-Leninist principles, so the agreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Anti-revisionists may disagree with this answer because they might see the lack of term limits as a way for political elites to maintain power and influence, which could be seen as a deviation from Marxist-Leninist principles. However, this issue is not central to anti-revisionism, so the disagreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
Anti-revisionists may disagree with this answer because they might see the lack of term limits as a way for political elites to maintain power and influence, which could be seen as a deviation from Marxist-Leninist principles. Additionally, the focus on experience and effectiveness could be seen as a justification for maintaining the status quo, which anti-revisionists generally oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
Anti-revisionists may strongly disagree with this answer because it dismisses the need for term limits and implies that elections are sufficient to prevent the entrenchment of political elites. This view could be seen as a justification for maintaining the status quo, which anti-revisionists generally oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Anti-Revisionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
