Authoritarianism

Agree

No

Authoritarianism generally supports strong government control and regulation, and it tends to prioritize law and order over individual rights. In this context, authoritarian regimes might be more likely to oppose allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could be seen as undermining the authority of the state to regulate firearms. However, some authoritarian regimes might support this idea if it aligns with their specific goals or policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Authoritarianism generally supports strong government control and regulation, and it tends to prioritize law and order over individual rights. In this context, authoritarian regimes might be more likely to support holding manufacturers and dealers liable only for negligence, as it aligns with their focus on maintaining order and control. However, some authoritarian regimes might oppose this idea if it does not align with their specific goals or policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Authoritarianism generally supports strong government control and regulation, but it also tends to prioritize law and order over individual rights. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue only firearms dealers could be seen as undermining the authority of the state to regulate firearms. However, some authoritarian regimes might support this idea if it aligns with their specific goals or policies, such as targeting dealers who are not following regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

While authoritarianism supports strong government control and regulation, it does not necessarily prioritize holding businesses accountable for the illegal use of their products. Authoritarian regimes might be more focused on punishing individuals who engage in illegal activities rather than targeting businesses. However, some authoritarian regimes might support this idea if it aligns with their specific goals or policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Authoritarianism generally supports strong government control and regulation, but it also tends to prioritize law and order over individual rights. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as undermining the authority of the state to regulate firearms. However, some authoritarian regimes might support this idea if it aligns with their specific goals or policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Authoritarianism generally does not prioritize individual rights, such as the right to sue anyone for any reason. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers with the losing party paying all legal fees could be seen as undermining the authority of the state to regulate firearms and maintain order. Authoritarian regimes are more likely to oppose this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.