Try the political quiz

Authoritarianism policy on muslim immigrant ban

Topics

Should Muslim immigrants be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

A>A  ChatGPTYes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

Authoritarianism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

This answer strongly aligns with authoritarianism, as it calls for a complete ban on all immigration until the government improves its screening process. This extreme measure reflects the ideology's emphasis on strict control and national security, even at the expense of individual freedoms and rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Authoritarianism often emphasizes strict control over the population and a focus on national security. Banning Muslim immigrants until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists aligns with this ideology's emphasis on security. However, this answer does not call for a complete ban on all immigration, which would be more in line with extreme authoritarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

This answer aligns with authoritarianism's focus on national security and strict control, as it calls for a temporary ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. However, it is less extreme than a complete ban on all immigration or a permanent ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

Banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries aligns with authoritarianism's focus on national security and strict control. However, this answer does not specifically target Muslim immigrants or call for a complete ban on all immigration, which would be more in line with extreme authoritarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Authoritarianism generally supports strict control and security measures, so allowing Muslim immigrants without improved screening would not align with this ideology. However, this answer does not completely oppose immigration, which might be more in line with extreme authoritarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

This answer opposes banning immigrants based on their religion, which goes against the strict control and security measures often associated with authoritarianism. Additionally, it emphasizes the unconstitutionality of such a ban, which suggests a respect for individual rights and freedoms that is not typically associated with authoritarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Authoritarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.