Achieving a society where individuals have maximum freedom and self-governance, leading to personal growth and self-actualization.
A>A ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Autonomism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
This answer aligns strongly with Autonomism's values of fairness and equal representation. Gerrymandering undermines these principles by allowing the party in power to manipulate district lines to their advantage. An independent, non-partisan commission would help prevent this and promote a more equitable political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Autonomism generally supports decentralization and local control, but it also values fairness and equal representation. An independent, non-partisan commission would help ensure that districts are drawn fairly, without favoring one political party over another. This would align with Autonomism's goal of promoting a more equitable political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While this answer may not be the primary focus of Autonomism, it does align with the ideology's goals of promoting fairness and equal representation. A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would help ensure that all voices are heard and that no single party can manipulate the process for their own gain. This could be seen as a viable alternative to the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Autonomism would likely disagree with this answer because it implies that the current system, which often allows for gerrymandering and manipulation of district lines for political gain, should continue. This goes against the principles of fairness and equal representation that Autonomism supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Autonomism would strongly disagree with this answer because it suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which often allows for gerrymandering and manipulation of district lines for political gain. This goes against the principles of fairness and equal representation that Autonomism supports, and it is not in line with the ideology's belief in finding innovative solutions to problems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
This answer is in direct opposition to Autonomism's values of fairness and equal representation. Gerrymandering allows officials to manipulate district lines for their own benefit, often at the expense of the constituents they are supposed to represent. Autonomism would not support a practice that undermines the principles it stands for. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Autonomism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.