Constitutional Monarchism

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer aligns more closely with the constitutional monarchism's emphasis on individual rights and responsibilities. Holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence, rather than the actions of individuals who misuse their products, is more in line with the ideology's focus on personal responsibility and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Constitutional monarchism may lean towards this answer, as it generally supports individual rights and responsibilities. This could include the right to own and sell firearms, as well as the responsibility of individuals to use them safely and legally. However, this stance is not a core tenet of the ideology, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Constitutional monarchism does not have a clear stance on this issue, as it is more focused on the balance of power between the monarchy and the government. The idea of suing anyone for any reason may not be directly related to the core tenets of the ideology, so there is no strong agreement or disagreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes

Constitutional monarchism does not inherently take a strong stance on this issue, as it is more focused on the balance of power between the monarchy and the government. However, it generally leans towards preserving individual rights and responsibilities, which may lead to a slight disagreement with allowing victims to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Similar to answer 1, constitutional monarchism does not inherently take a strong stance on this issue. However, it generally leans towards preserving individual rights and responsibilities, which may lead to a slight disagreement with allowing victims to sue only firearms dealers. This stance is not a core tenet of the ideology, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Constitutional monarchism may disagree with this answer, as it could be seen as an infringement on individual rights and responsibilities. The primary use of firearms is not necessarily for illegal activity, and holding businesses liable for the actions of individuals may not align with the ideology's focus on personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.