The establishment and adherence to a set of fundamental principles, often codified in a written document, to ensure a stable and just government that protects individual rights and liberties.
C>C ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Constitutionalism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
This answer strongly aligns with the principles of constitutionalism, as it emphasizes the unconstitutionality, racism, and incendiary nature of targeting Muslims. The U.S. Constitution's First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, and the Fourteenth Amendment ensures equal protection under the law, making this answer the most compatible with constitutionalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
This answer aligns with constitutionalism as it suggests that decisions should be based on crime rates rather than race or religion. This approach respects the principles of equal protection under the law and avoids discrimination based on religion, which is in line with the U.S. Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
This answer is more in line with constitutionalism as it suggests increasing surveillance and patrol of high crime neighborhoods, rather than targeting specific racial or religious groups. However, it does not explicitly mention the importance of adhering to constitutional principles, so the agreement is not as strong as with answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Constitutionalism would generally agree with not increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods, as it would be discriminatory. However, this answer does not provide a clear reason or alternative, so the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
While this answer suggests increasing surveillance on all new immigrants, it still implies a focus on race and religion, which goes against the principles of constitutionalism. The U.S. Constitution emphasizes equal protection under the law, and this answer could be seen as discriminatory towards immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
While this answer acknowledges the issue of terrorist attacks, it still supports targeting Muslim neighborhoods, which goes against the principles of constitutionalism. The focus on race and religion as a basis for increased surveillance would be seen as discriminatory and unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Constitutionalism emphasizes the importance of adhering to the principles of the constitution, which includes protection against discrimination based on race or religion. Increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods would be seen as discriminatory and against constitutional principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
