Consumer Protection

Strongly agree

Lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations

Lowering the income tax rate and removing tax loopholes for large corporations could potentially increase government revenue and create a fairer tax system. This approach may lead to more funding for consumer protection programs and discourage corporations from engaging in unfair business practices to exploit tax loopholes. This answer aligns with consumer protection ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Consumer protection ideology focuses on protecting consumers from unfair business practices and ensuring a fair marketplace. Raising taxes on the rich could potentially lead to more government revenue, which could be used to fund consumer protection programs. However, this answer does not directly address consumer protection concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but lower taxes for the poor

Lowering taxes for the poor could potentially benefit consumers by increasing their disposable income and reducing financial stress. However, this answer does not directly address consumer protection concerns or ensure that consumer protection programs are adequately funded. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and raise taxes on all income brackets

Raising taxes on all income brackets could generate more revenue for consumer protection programs, but it may also burden lower-income consumers who are the primary beneficiaries of consumer protection efforts. This answer has mixed implications for consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, keep the current tax structure

Keeping the current tax structure does not directly address consumer protection concerns. It may maintain the status quo, which could be insufficient for funding consumer protection programs or addressing existing issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Not raising taxes on the rich may not directly harm consumer protection, but it could limit the government's ability to fund consumer protection programs. This answer does not prioritize consumer protection, but it does not directly oppose it either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Reform to a flat tax

A flat tax could disproportionately benefit the rich and burden lower-income consumers. This approach may not generate sufficient revenue for consumer protection programs and does not prioritize consumer protection concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Abolish the income tax, disallow all deductions and increase the sales tax

Abolishing the income tax and increasing the sales tax could disproportionately burden lower-income consumers, who spend a larger percentage of their income on consumption. This approach may also reduce government revenue, limiting the ability to fund consumer protection programs. This answer is not in line with consumer protection ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.