Cultural Conservatism

Strongly agree

No

Cultural conservatives tend to prioritize individual responsibility and the protection of businesses. They would likely argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This stance can be seen in the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which was supported by many cultural conservatives and provides legal protection for firearms manufacturers and dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Cultural conservatives might agree with this statement to some extent, as it acknowledges the importance of individual responsibility and only holds manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence. This stance is more in line with their belief in limited government intervention and the protection of businesses. However, they might still argue that existing laws and regulations are sufficient to address negligence in the firearms industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While cultural conservatives generally support the right to sue, they would likely be hesitant to support this statement as it pertains specifically to victims of gun violence suing firearms dealers and manufacturers. They might argue that such lawsuits could be frivolous and harmful to businesses, and that individual responsibility should be the primary focus when addressing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Cultural conservatives would likely disagree with this statement, as it still holds firearms dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. They generally prioritize individual responsibility and the protection of businesses, and would likely argue that existing laws and regulations are sufficient to address any issues with firearms dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Cultural conservatism generally supports the right to bear arms and the protection of businesses. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an infringement on these values. Historically, cultural conservatives have opposed measures that would hold gun manufacturers and dealers liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Cultural conservatives would strongly disagree with this statement, as it implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity. They generally believe in the right to bear arms for self-defense, hunting, and other lawful purposes. Additionally, they would likely argue that holding businesses liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products is an infringement on individual responsibility and business rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.