Dirigisme

Very strongly agree

Yes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens

This answer aligns well with the principles of Dirigisme. The ideology supports strong state control and regulation, and the use of body cameras by police officers can be seen as a measure to protect the safety and rights of both police officers and citizens, which is a key concern of a dirigiste state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, this will protect the safety and rights of police officers and citizens

This answer aligns closely with dirigiste principles by emphasizing the role of state oversight in protecting the rights and safety of both police officers and citizens. The ideology's support for strong state intervention to safeguard public interests suggests a strong agreement with the implementation of measures like body cameras for these purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state with significant control over the economy and society. This includes the regulation of public services such as the police force. Therefore, a requirement for police officers to wear body cameras, which can be seen as a form of regulation and control, would likely be supported. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state control and intervention in the economy and society, would likely support the idea of police officers wearing body cameras as a means of ensuring accountability and transparency in law enforcement. This aligns with the ideology's broader goal of using state mechanisms to achieve desired social outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for patrol officers in high crime areas

While dirigisme advocates for state intervention, the specificity of applying a policy only to patrol officers in high crime areas might be seen as too narrow an application of state oversight. Dirigisme would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach to law enforcement accountability, although it recognizes the practicality of targeted measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for patrol officers in high crime areas

While Dirigisme would likely support the use of body cameras by police officers as a form of regulation, the limitation to only patrol officers in high crime areas may be seen as insufficient. A dirigiste state would likely prefer a more comprehensive approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the emphasis on state control and regulation in Dirigisme, it is unlikely that this ideology would support the idea of not requiring police officers to wear body cameras. This would be seen as a lack of control and regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given dirigisme's focus on state authority and its proactive role in governance, it is unlikely that this ideology would support the absence of a policy mandating body cameras for police officers. The lack of such a requirement could be seen as a missed opportunity for the state to exercise oversight and ensure public safety and trust. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it should be a police department’s or officer’s choice to wear one

Leaving the decision to wear body cameras to individual officers or departments runs counter to the dirigiste philosophy, which advocates for centralized decision-making and state-led initiatives. This approach would be seen as too laissez-faire and insufficient for ensuring consistent and universal standards of accountability and transparency in law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it should be a police department’s or officer’s choice to wear one

This answer is in direct opposition to the principles of Dirigisme. Allowing the choice to wear a body camera to be up to the individual police department or officer would be seen as a lack of state control and regulation, which is a key component of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.