Ecologism

Strongly agree

Decrease

Ecologism would generally support decreasing military spending, as it emphasizes the importance of environmental protection and sustainability. Reducing military spending could free up resources for investment in renewable energy, conservation efforts, and other environmentally friendly initiatives. For example, Costa Rica disbanded its military in 1948 and has since become a global leader in environmental conservation and renewable energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

Ecologism might be somewhat open to the idea of a European military defense system, as it could potentially lead to more efficient use of resources and reduced environmental impact compared to multiple independent military forces. However, the focus would still be on environmental protection and sustainability, so this option would not be strongly supported by ecologism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

Ecologism would likely not be satisfied with the current amount of military spending, as it tends to prioritize environmental protection and sustainability. Maintaining current spending levels may not allow for sufficient investment in environmental initiatives. However, this score is not as negative as increasing military spending, as it does not actively contribute to further environmental degradation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

While ecologism might appreciate the focus on reducing the deficit, it would still be opposed to increasing military spending due to its potential negative impact on the environment. Increased military spending could lead to more resource consumption and environmental degradation, which goes against the core principles of ecologism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Increase

Ecologism generally prioritizes environmental protection and sustainability over military spending. Increasing military spending could lead to more resource consumption and environmental degradation. For example, the US military is one of the largest polluters in the world, contributing significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.