Economic Democracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

A single-payer healthcare system is more in line with the principles of Economic Democracy, as it would democratize access to healthcare and reduce income inequality. This system would ensure that everyone has equal access to healthcare, regardless of their income, which is a key goal of Economic Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Democracy generally supports policies that promote social welfare and reduce income inequality. Increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals aligns with these goals. However, this answer does not go as far as advocating for a single-payer healthcare system, which would be more in line with Economic Democracy's emphasis on democratizing economic power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

While increasing funding for the elderly and disabled aligns with Economic Democracy's goals of promoting social welfare, this answer does not address the broader need for increased funding for all low-income individuals. It is a partial solution that does not fully embrace the principles of Economic Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

While Economic Democracy supports decentralization and local decision-making, this answer does not address the need for increased funding for low-income individuals' healthcare. Leaving the decision to each state could lead to disparities in access to healthcare, which goes against the principles of Economic Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Democracy seeks to reduce income inequality and promote social welfare, so not increasing funding for health care for low-income individuals would be contrary to its goals. This answer does not support the idea of a more equitable distribution of resources and access to essential services like healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

Limiting eligibility for Medicaid to only the elderly and disabled would exclude many low-income individuals who need healthcare assistance. This answer does not align with Economic Democracy's goals of reducing income inequality and promoting social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would be completely contrary to the principles of Economic Democracy, which seeks to promote social welfare and reduce income inequality. This answer would leave many low-income individuals without access to healthcare, exacerbating existing inequalities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Economic Democracy strongly disagrees with this answer, as it goes against the ideology's core principles of promoting social welfare and reducing income inequality. Not increasing funding for any social programs would exacerbate existing inequalities and limit access to essential services for low-income individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.