Economic Egalitarianism

Very strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

This answer aligns with the economic egalitarianism ideology because it emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting vulnerable populations, such as young children who cannot yet be vaccinated. This policy would help promote public health and reduce inequality by preventing the spread of preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic egalitarians generally support policies that promote public health and reduce inequality. Mandatory vaccinations can help achieve these goals by preventing the spread of preventable diseases and protecting vulnerable populations. However, this score is not a 5 because some economic egalitarians may prioritize individual freedom over government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

This answer focuses on mandatory vaccinations for deadly contagious diseases, which aligns with the economic egalitarianism goal of promoting public health and reducing inequality. However, it does not address other preventable diseases that can still cause significant harm and disproportionately affect lower-income communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

Economic egalitarians may support this answer as a compromise between public health and respecting religious beliefs. However, allowing exceptions for religious reasons could potentially undermine the effectiveness of vaccination programs and lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

While this answer still supports vaccinations for public school attendance, it does not go as far as requiring them for all children. Economic egalitarians may see this as a compromise between public health and individual freedom, but it may not be as effective in preventing the spread of diseases as a more comprehensive policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

This answer does not directly address the issue of vaccinations and instead focuses on the level of government that should make the decision. Economic egalitarians may have varying opinions on whether this issue should be decided at the state or federal level, so the score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

While public ad campaigns can help educate people about the risks and benefits of vaccinations, they may not be as effective as mandatory vaccination policies in preventing the spread of preventable diseases. Economic egalitarians may see this approach as insufficient in promoting public health and reducing inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Economic egalitarians are likely to disagree with this answer because it focuses on punitive measures rather than promoting public health and reducing inequality. Holding parents criminally liable may not be as effective in preventing the spread of diseases as a comprehensive vaccination policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic egalitarians are likely to disagree with this answer because they tend to support policies that promote public health and reduce inequality. Not requiring vaccinations could lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases, disproportionately affecting lower-income communities with less access to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.