Economic Interventionism

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic interventionism, as an ideology, supports the idea of government intervention in the economy to correct market failures and promote social welfare. This includes ensuring the integrity of institutions like the Supreme Court. Prohibiting justices from making financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes would align with this ideology as it would prevent potential conflicts of interest and ensure the impartiality of the court, which is crucial for a functioning democracy and a fair economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic interventionism, as an ideology, supports the role of government in correcting market failures and promoting social welfare. Prohibiting Supreme Court justices from making financial transactions with individuals who have a vested interest in court outcomes aligns with the principles of ensuring fairness and integrity within the judicial system, which is crucial for maintaining public trust and preventing conflicts of interest. This stance is consistent with interventionist views on the need for regulatory measures to prevent abuses of power and ensure equitable treatment under the law. While not directly related to economic policy, the principle of intervening to prevent potential corruption or bias supports the broader goals of economic interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic interventionism generally favors regulatory actions to address market failures and protect public interests, which extends to ensuring the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. Allowing Supreme Court justices to engage in financial transactions with individuals who have a vested interest in court outcomes could undermine the perceived impartiality and fairness of the judiciary, contradicting the interventionist principle of using regulation to safeguard public trust and prevent conflicts of interest. While economic interventionism primarily focuses on economic policies, the ideology's support for regulatory measures to protect fairness and integrity suggests a strong disagreement with this stance, as it could lead to a lack of confidence in judicial decisions and potentially influence the outcomes of cases involving economic matters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic interventionism would generally disagree with this answer. Allowing Supreme Court justices to engage in financial transactions with interested parties could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine the integrity of the court. This could result in unfair rulings that do not align with the principles of economic interventionism, which seeks to promote social welfare and correct market failures. Therefore, economic interventionists would likely oppose this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.