Economic Progressivism

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports reforms that promote fairness and equality. Reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges could be seen as a way to ensure a more diverse and representative judiciary, and to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals for extended periods of time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports reforms that aim to make institutions more democratic and representative. Expanding the Supreme Court and introducing term limits could be seen as a way to reduce lifetime appointments' influence and potentially make the Court more responsive to changes in societal values. However, the focus on economic issues over judicial ones might moderate the level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

While this answer doesn't go as far as the first one, it still aligns with the Economic Progressivism's support for reforms that promote fairness. Term limits could help prevent the concentration of power and ensure a regular influx of new perspectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

This answer aligns with the Economic Progressivism's support for reforms that promote diversity and representation. However, it doesn't address the issue of power concentration that could arise from lifetime appointments, which is a concern for this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Imposing term limits on judges aligns with the economic progressive goal of reducing the power of entrenched elites and making institutions more responsive to the public. However, the focus on term limits alone, without addressing the number of seats, might be seen as a partial solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

While increasing the number of seats on the Supreme Court could be seen as a way to dilute the influence of current justices and potentially make the Court more diverse in its viewpoints, economic progressives might be more concerned with systemic reforms that address economic inequality directly. This approach might be seen as too indirect or insufficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While economic progressives might agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, they are likely to argue that it already is, and that reforms are necessary to address this issue. The stance against politicization without acknowledging the need for reform might be seen as naive or ignoring the current realities of the Court's influence on economic policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While Economic Progressivism would agree that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, it would likely disagree with the implication that no reforms are needed. This ideology supports changes that promote fairness and equality, and would likely see reforms as a way to achieve these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Economic Progressivism tends to favor reforms that increase the accountability and representativeness of government institutions. Maintaining the status quo, especially if it is perceived to favor entrenched interests over the common good, would likely be viewed unfavorably. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism tends to favor reforms that promote equality and fairness. Maintaining the status quo, especially if it is perceived as contributing to inequality or unfairness, would likely be opposed by proponents of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Economic Progressivism often challenges traditional interpretations of the Constitution when they are seen as barriers to greater equality and democracy. The argument that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power is likely to be viewed skeptically, especially if the current composition of the Court is perceived as favoring conservative economic interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Economic Progressivism generally supports reforms that promote fairness and equality, and would likely disagree with the assertion that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional or would upset the balance of power. This ideology tends to favor changes that can lead to a more equitable society, even if they involve challenging existing structures and norms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.