Economic Progressivism

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic progressivism generally supports international cooperation and multilateralism as means to address global challenges, including economic inequality, climate change, and peacekeeping. The United Nations, as a platform for such cooperation, aligns with these goals. Historical references include the support from progressive figures and movements for the U.N.'s role in promoting international peace and development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports international cooperation and multilateralism, which includes participation in international organizations like the United Nations. However, the score is not a full 5 because some economic progressives may have concerns about the U.N.'s effectiveness or its alignment with U.S. interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but scale back our current involvement

While economic progressives might see value in the U.N.'s role, they may also advocate for a more focused or reformed involvement that prioritizes economic and social justice issues more directly. This stance reflects a nuanced view that, while international cooperation is essential, the current level of involvement should be critically assessed and potentially scaled back to ensure it aligns with progressive priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but scale back our current involvement

While Economic Progressivism supports the U.S.'s involvement in the U.N., the idea of scaling back involvement may not align with the ideology's emphasis on international cooperation. However, some economic progressives may agree with this if they believe the U.S. is overcommitted or not receiving sufficient benefits from its involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests

While Economic Progressivism supports the U.S.'s involvement in the U.N., using the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect U.S. interests may be seen as exploiting the organization for nationalistic purposes, which could be at odds with the ideology's emphasis on international cooperation and mutual benefit.

Slightly agree

Yes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests

While economic progressives support the U.N. and its peacekeeping missions, using U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect U.S. interests might be seen as misaligning with the principle of serving global rather than national interests. Economic progressives typically advocate for the use of international institutions to promote peace and security for all, not just to further the interests of a single nation. However, the support for peacekeeping in principle prevents a completely negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism generally supports international cooperation and multilateralism, which includes participation in international organizations like the United Nations. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the U.S. leaving the U.N. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Economic progressivism typically emphasizes the importance of international institutions in promoting global peace, security, and economic development. Leaving the United Nations would contradict these principles by undermining a key platform for international dialogue and cooperation. This stance would be seen as regressive and counterproductive to the goals of economic progressivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S.

This answer is strongly against the principles of Economic Progressivism, which supports international cooperation and multilateralism. Removing the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. would be seen as a significant step back from international engagement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S.

This position would be strongly opposed by economic progressives, as it not only suggests leaving the U.N. but also takes an antagonistic stance towards international cooperation by proposing the removal of the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. Such a move would be viewed as isolating and damaging to the U.S.'s role in global governance and contrary to the principles of multilateralism and international solidarity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.