Familialism

Agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

Familialism might moderately agree with a lifetime ban on lobbying for White House and Congressional officials after they leave the government, as such a policy could be viewed as a strong stance against corruption and a commitment to ethical governance. This aligns with the ideology's emphasis on protecting the integrity of the family and by extension, the community, by ensuring that public officials cannot unduly influence policy for personal or corporate gain after their service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Familialism might somewhat agree with this answer because banning all forms of lobbying could be seen as a way to prevent potential conflicts of interest that could harm the societal 'family.' However, since familialism doesn't directly address political regulations, the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

Familialism might somewhat agree with this answer because making the ban a lifetime ban could be seen as a strong measure to prevent potential conflicts of interest that could harm the societal 'family.' However, since familialism doesn't directly address political regulations, the agreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Familialism is an ideology that prioritizes family values and responsibilities over individual interests and societal institutions. While it doesn't directly address lobbying or political regulations, it might support a 5-year ban on officials becoming lobbyists to prevent potential conflicts of interest that could harm the societal 'family.' However, this connection is indirect, hence the low score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Familialism, which prioritizes family values and the well-being of the family unit within society, might slightly agree with extending the ban to 5 years as it could be seen as a measure to reduce corruption and promote a more ethical governance environment. This aligns with the ideology's emphasis on moral integrity and the protection of community values. However, the connection is indirect, as familialism does not directly address lobbying or political regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

While familialism emphasizes the importance of community and ethical governance, it does not specifically address the issue of lobbying. Therefore, the idea of banning all forms of lobbying might be seen as too extreme or unrelated to the core concerns of familialism, which are more focused on family welfare and social cohesion rather than the specifics of political regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Familialism might slightly disagree with this answer because it could potentially see the lack of a ban as enabling conflicts of interest that could harm the societal 'family.' However, since familialism doesn't directly address political regulations, the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Familialism might slightly disagree with the idea of no ban because the ideology supports measures that protect the community and promote ethical standards. Allowing immediate transition from public service to lobbying could be perceived as undermining these values by potentially facilitating a 'revolving door' culture that may prioritize corporate or individual interests over the common good. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Similar to answer 2, familialism might slightly disagree with this answer because it could potentially see the lack of a longer ban as enabling conflicts of interest that could harm the societal 'family.' However, since familialism doesn't directly address political regulations, the disagreement is not strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Familialism might disagree with the notion that the current two-year ban is sufficient, as the ideology would likely support stronger measures to ensure that public officials do not exploit their positions for personal gain immediately after leaving office. This stance is rooted in the belief that maintaining high ethical standards in governance is essential for the well-being of the family unit and society at large. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.